2021
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing protoplanetary disk evolution in the Chamaeleon II region

Abstract: Context. Characterizing the evolution of protoplanetary disks is necessary to improve our understanding of planet formation. Constraints on both dust and gas are needed to determine the dominant disk dissipation mechanisms. Aims. We aim to compare the disk dust masses in the Chamaeleon II (Cha II) star-forming region with other regions with ages between 1 and 10 Myr. Methods. We use ALMA band 6 observations (1.3 mm) to survey 29 protoplanetary disks in Cha II. Dust mass estimates are derived from the continuum… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Millimeter interferometry is one of the best ways to measure the bulk properties of disks, in particular their masses, sizes, and large-scale spatial features (e.g., Williams and Cieza 2011). ALMA's combination of sensitivity and resolution has enabled near-complete surveys of these bulk properties for disk populations across all the major nearby star-forming regions (e.g., Ansdell et al 2016;Barenfeld et al 2016;Pascucci et al 2016;Eisner et al 2018;Ruíz-Rodríguez et al 2018;Cazzoletti et al 2019;Grant et al 2021;Villenave et al 2021;van Terwisga et al 2022), which have led to a significant improvement of detection rate and number of surveyed regions (see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Protoplanetary Disk Masses and Sizes From MM Interferometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Millimeter interferometry is one of the best ways to measure the bulk properties of disks, in particular their masses, sizes, and large-scale spatial features (e.g., Williams and Cieza 2011). ALMA's combination of sensitivity and resolution has enabled near-complete surveys of these bulk properties for disk populations across all the major nearby star-forming regions (e.g., Ansdell et al 2016;Barenfeld et al 2016;Pascucci et al 2016;Eisner et al 2018;Ruíz-Rodríguez et al 2018;Cazzoletti et al 2019;Grant et al 2021;Villenave et al 2021;van Terwisga et al 2022), which have led to a significant improvement of detection rate and number of surveyed regions (see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Protoplanetary Disk Masses and Sizes From MM Interferometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By sampling star-forming regions with different ages, the recent ALMA surveys have been able to demonstrate that, in general, the continuum emission, interpreted as disk dust mass, systematically decreases with the age of the region (e.g., Ansdell et al 2016Ansdell et al , 2017Barenfeld et al 2016;Pascucci et al 2016;Eisner et al 2018;Ruíz-Rodríguez et al 2018;Cox et al 2017;van Terwisga et al 2019van Terwisga et al , 2020Villenave et al 2021, see Fig. 5), likely reflecting disk dispersal, dust evolution and/or grain growth (e.g., Pinilla et al 2020).…”
Section: Disk Dust Mass As a Function Of Agementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the disk mass content is crucial to determine whether planet formation may occur. Disk population studies in nearby star-forming regions (e.g., Barenfeld et al 2016;Ansdell et al 2016;Testi et al 2016;Pascucci et al 2016;Cieza et al 2019;Williams et al 2019;Sanchis et al 2020;Villenave et al 2021) proved that the scaling relation between disk mass and stellar mass is steeper than linear. Therefore, it appears that disks in the low-stellar-mass regime do not possess enough material to form the known planetary systems (Manara et al 2018), unless the planet-formation efficiency is 100% (Mulders et al 2021).…”
Section: Implications For Planet Formation Around Vlm Starsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are numerous observations of protoplanetary disks (e.g., Andrews 2020), and various aspects of their evolution have been modeled theoretically, the properties of such protoplanetary disks are still not well constrained. Indeed, we still do not have a complete picture of the evolution of even our own protosolar nebula (e.g., Villenave et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%