“…For biological iron–sulfur protein systems, the electronic structure and geometry of a cluster are primarily defined by the immediate ligand coordination environment, which can be further tuned by the pattern of hydrogen bonding with the backbone peptide matrix. − ,− All of these through-bond interactions can be addressed by spectroscopic approaches, such as pulsed electron and nuclear magnetic resonance (EPR and NMR, respectively) techniques. , EPR in particular is the method of choice for probing the physicochemical parameters that quantitatively define how the unpaired electron spin density delocalizes into the protein framework with respect to the molecular atomic coordinates. ,,− Currently, the most straightforward experimental approach for iron–sulfur protein systems with slow electronic relaxation rates is selective 15 N, 13 C, or 2 H isotope labeling of each amino acid type in the region local to the paramagnetic cluster-binding domain, regardless of whether pulsed EPR or NMR methods are employed. ,,, For this purpose, we have engineered a set of Escherichia coli amino acid auxotroph expression host strains for heterologous overproduction of selectively 15 N- and/or 13 C-amino acid isotope-labeled iron–sulfur proteins , and have applied these techniques to characterize the electronic structure of the reduced cluster site in the hyperthermophilic archaeal Rieske-type [2Fe-2S](His) 2 (Cys) 2 ferredoxin (ARF) from Sulfolobus solfataricus P1 (DSM 1616) − as a tractable model protein using two-dimensional, four-pulse electron spin–echo envelope modulation (ESEEM) [also called hyperfine sublevel correlation (HYSCORE)] spectroscopy. ,, …”