2011
DOI: 10.1080/08957959.2011.562897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing structural stability of double-walled carbon nanotubes at high non-hydrostatic pressure by Raman spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as pointed out before, the R5 peak also disappears at $5.2 GPa. Similar results for the RBLMs have been obtained by Shujie et al [39] for the collapse of the outer tubes with different diameters. Our observation of a maximum value of FWHM of the G-band components at 3e4 GPa, would then correspond with the highest degree of disorder due to mixing between pristine and collapsed geometries.…”
Section: Experimental Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, as pointed out before, the R5 peak also disappears at $5.2 GPa. Similar results for the RBLMs have been obtained by Shujie et al [39] for the collapse of the outer tubes with different diameters. Our observation of a maximum value of FWHM of the G-band components at 3e4 GPa, would then correspond with the highest degree of disorder due to mixing between pristine and collapsed geometries.…”
Section: Experimental Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Other dynamic high-pressure experiments found that only minor tube structure damage occurs below 19 GPa, with the collapse of the double-wall CNT occurring at $ 26 GPa [37]. However, other works which considered similar diameter distributions reported collapse or large structural modifications at different pressures ranging from $ 13e15 GPa [18,38] to $ 25 GPa [17,39]. Such important discrepancies can be attributed to the difficulty in working with double-wall CNT samples, mainly due to the large diameter distribution, the effect of the environment on the resonance conditions, and the presence of defects, which depend on synthesis, preparation and handling of the samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several earlier experimental studies (mostly Raman) reported higher critical pressures for the structural transition of the outer tube in DWCNTs as compared to SWCNTs, and this was attributed to the structural support of the outer tube by the inner tube. 7,30,34 The enhanced structural stability of the outer tube was theoretically predicted by Yang et al 35 : For small-diameter (5,5)(10,10) DWCNT bundles (d inner ≈0.68 nm, d outer ≈1.36 nm) a small discontinuous volume change appears at the critical pressure P d =18 GPa, accompanied by a cross sections' change between two deformed hexagons; the collapse to peanut shaped cross sections, however, happens at higher pressure. In contrast, (7,7)(12,12) DWCNT bundles (d inner ≈0.95 nm, d outer ≈1.63 nm) undergo one structural phase transition and collapse at P d =10.6 GPa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%