2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep11(2021)175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing superheavy dark matter with gravitational waves

Abstract: We study the superheavy dark matter (DM) scenario in an extended B−L model, where one generation of right-handed neutrino νR is the DM candidate. If there is a new lighter sterile neutrino that co-annihilate with the DM candidate, then the annihilation rate is exponentially enhanced, allowing a DM mass much heavier than the Griest-Kamionkowski bound (∼105 GeV). We demonstrate that a DM mass MνR ≳ 1013 GeV can be achieved. Although beyond the scale of any traditional DM searching strategy, this scenario is test… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The summary of our results is shown in figure 7: while only GWs will potentially test all the parameter space up to m DM ∼ 10 6 TeV, for DM masses of hundreds of TeV telescopes will provide a complementary access to the same models, realising a new kind of multimessenger approach to heavy DM. 19 Other ways to evade this bound are, for example, DM dilution after a matter era [128,[223][224][225][226][227][228][229][230][231][232][233], or having a dark sector being much cooler than SM [234,235], DM becoming heavy only after freezing-out [236], DM annihilating with one spectator field [237,238] or with many of them [239], DM forming an extended object which undergoes a second annihilation stage [240][241][242]. Mechanisms involving phase transitions include the possibility of a short inflationary stage associated with perturbative DM mass generation [147], DM filtered [243][244][245] or squeezed-out [246][247][248] by non-relativistic bubble wall motion, DM produced by elastic bubble-bubble collisions [249] or perturbative plasma interactions with relativistic walls [250].…”
Section: Jhep07(2022)084mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The summary of our results is shown in figure 7: while only GWs will potentially test all the parameter space up to m DM ∼ 10 6 TeV, for DM masses of hundreds of TeV telescopes will provide a complementary access to the same models, realising a new kind of multimessenger approach to heavy DM. 19 Other ways to evade this bound are, for example, DM dilution after a matter era [128,[223][224][225][226][227][228][229][230][231][232][233], or having a dark sector being much cooler than SM [234,235], DM becoming heavy only after freezing-out [236], DM annihilating with one spectator field [237,238] or with many of them [239], DM forming an extended object which undergoes a second annihilation stage [240][241][242]. Mechanisms involving phase transitions include the possibility of a short inflationary stage associated with perturbative DM mass generation [147], DM filtered [243][244][245] or squeezed-out [246][247][248] by non-relativistic bubble wall motion, DM produced by elastic bubble-bubble collisions [249] or perturbative plasma interactions with relativistic walls [250].…”
Section: Jhep07(2022)084mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we also like to comment on the detection prospect of the model under consideration. The spontaneous breaking of the U (1) B−L symmetry at a high energy scale leads to the formation of Nambu-Goto cosmic strings [69]. Once formed, the collisions and selfinteractions of strings produce non-self-interacting string loops, which further oscillates and radiates its energy in the form of gravitational wave (GW).…”
Section: Case A: Complete Ffi Region When Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many candidates for the dark matter particles, like, for example, axions, neutrinos, WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles), gravitinos, neutralinos etc. (for reviews of the candidates for dark matter particle see [40][41][42][43]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%