2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.115.085301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the Excitations of a Lieb-Liniger Gas from Weak to Strong Coupling

Abstract: Probing the Excitations of a Lieb-Liniger Gas from Weak to Strong CouplingMeinert, F.; Panfil, M.K.; Mark, M. J.; Lauber, K.; Caux, J.S.; Nägerl, H.-C. General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of cer… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
161
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Bragg experiments, the detected Bragg signal is directly proportional to the Fourier transform of the two-point density-density correlation function [321][322][323][324] or dynamical structure factor S q,t,ω = dδdxe i(qx−ωδ) {n(t + δ/2, x), n(t−δ/2, 0)} . In the Luttinger framework in the Keldysh formalism this translates into S q,t,ω = − ρ c (−q, t, −ω)ρ c (q, t, ω) .…”
Section: Observabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bragg experiments, the detected Bragg signal is directly proportional to the Fourier transform of the two-point density-density correlation function [321][322][323][324] or dynamical structure factor S q,t,ω = dδdxe i(qx−ωδ) {n(t + δ/2, x), n(t−δ/2, 0)} . In the Luttinger framework in the Keldysh formalism this translates into S q,t,ω = − ρ c (−q, t, −ω)ρ c (q, t, ω) .…”
Section: Observabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(40), yield g 3 (γ) in close agreement with accurate approximate expressions obtained in [23] by fitting on the numerical solution of Eqs. (7), (8), (9) and (40), as illustrated in Appendix C. Having performed all these verifications, we plot in Fig. 3 the coefficient c 4 as a function of γ from numerical calculations and the conjectures on e 2 and e 4 .…”
Section: B Conjecture In the Strongly-interacting Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The one-dimensional Bose gas with contact interactions, known as the Lieb-Liniger model, is the paradigm of such systems [1]. This model well describes experiments with ultracold atoms in tight waveguides and some of its correlation functions have been experimentally probed in all interaction regimes [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. From a theoretical point of view, since the model is integrable, its k-body correlations can in principle be obtained explicitly at all orders k, since they are linked to the (infinite) set of integrals of motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments with ultracold quantum gases are able to realize effectively one-dimensional systems by tightly confining the gas in two of the three spatial dimensions, either using optical lattice potentials or atom-chip traps [2,39,95,96,179,247,247,248,[276][277][278][279][280][281][282][283][284]. These experiments are now probing the predictions of the Lieb-Liniger model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bragg spectroscopy [247,248], and the contributions of the Type II branch to the dynamical structure factor, which does not have a counterpart in higher dimensions, has been revealed by comparing to numerical predictions obtained with algebraic Bethe ansatz based methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%