2023
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c10178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the Hydrophobic Region of a Lipid Bilayer at Specific Depths Using Vibrational Spectroscopy

Md Muhaiminul Islam,
Sithara U. Nawagamuwage,
Igor V. Parshin
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 89 publications
(158 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have also been studies on the changes in peak width and more prominently, asymmetry, reported for azide probes due to the existence of a Fermi resonance peak blue-shifted by around 30–40 cm –1 from the main peak. In some instances, the prominence and width changes due to the resonance have been directly connected to the angular range of motion explored by the bond between the azide and the linking carbon atom. , Analysis of the molecular dynamics simulations in this work has shown that all measured species have a matching C–N–N angular distribution with a fwhm of 10.5° centered around about 116°, which is not sufficient to explain the subtle differences in FTIR line width (Figure S16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have also been studies on the changes in peak width and more prominently, asymmetry, reported for azide probes due to the existence of a Fermi resonance peak blue-shifted by around 30–40 cm –1 from the main peak. In some instances, the prominence and width changes due to the resonance have been directly connected to the angular range of motion explored by the bond between the azide and the linking carbon atom. , Analysis of the molecular dynamics simulations in this work has shown that all measured species have a matching C–N–N angular distribution with a fwhm of 10.5° centered around about 116°, which is not sufficient to explain the subtle differences in FTIR line width (Figure S16).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%