2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.105.245145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the interlayer coupling in 2HNbS2 via soft x-ray angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy band structure of SPO examined in earlier theoretical studies reveals a reversal of the Sr‐ 4d‐ and Pb‐ 6p ‐dominated bands below and above the Fermi energy, respectively. [ 16 ] This gives rise to six band crossings along the X–Γ k‐path due to strong hybridization of the Sr‐ 4d and Pb‐ 6p orbitals and SOC. Klintenberg et al, [ 17 ] Hsieh et al, [ 18 ] and Chiu et al [ 19 ] carried out detailed density functional theory (DFT)‐based studies on the A 3 PbO systems which show that the electronic band structure of SPO is dominated by SOC and the TI nature is protected by cubic point group symmetries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy band structure of SPO examined in earlier theoretical studies reveals a reversal of the Sr‐ 4d‐ and Pb‐ 6p ‐dominated bands below and above the Fermi energy, respectively. [ 16 ] This gives rise to six band crossings along the X–Γ k‐path due to strong hybridization of the Sr‐ 4d and Pb‐ 6p orbitals and SOC. Klintenberg et al, [ 17 ] Hsieh et al, [ 18 ] and Chiu et al [ 19 ] carried out detailed density functional theory (DFT)‐based studies on the A 3 PbO systems which show that the electronic band structure of SPO is dominated by SOC and the TI nature is protected by cubic point group symmetries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optical band gap of monolayer NbSe 2 flakes was reported to be around ∼1.3 eV. 50 As the thickness increases, the band gap of NbSe 2 would decrease due to the interlayer coupling effect, 51 which would induce a considerable reabsorption effect of the SH signal and underestimates the second-order nonlinear optical response of the few-layer NbSe 2 flakes. In consideration of the linear absorption effect of the SH signal, the inherent second-order nonlinear susceptibility of the monolayer counterpart could be estimated as d eff inh = d eff exp / Q abs , where d eff exp is the experimentally measured effective second-order nonlinear susceptibility of odd-layered flakes and Q abs stands for the absorption of the measured few-layer sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%