2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.222301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the Neutron Skin with Ultrarelativistic Isobaric Collisions

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
28
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, those differences have been observed in isobar data [26] and are consistent with the predictions from energy density functional theory (DFT) calculations [27][28][29]. The DFT calculations indicate a large halo-type neutron skin thickness (Δ𝑟 np ) for the 96 Zr nucleus [30]; the Δ𝑟 np is 0.183 fm for 96 Zr and 0.042 fm for 96 Ru with a reasonable parameter set (see [30]). The neutron skin difference between 96 Zr and 96 Ru comes from the neutron-proton asymmetry in nuclear matter equation of state (EOS), which is encoded by the symmetry energy [31][32][33].…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, those differences have been observed in isobar data [26] and are consistent with the predictions from energy density functional theory (DFT) calculations [27][28][29]. The DFT calculations indicate a large halo-type neutron skin thickness (Δ𝑟 np ) for the 96 Zr nucleus [30]; the Δ𝑟 np is 0.183 fm for 96 Zr and 0.042 fm for 96 Ru with a reasonable parameter set (see [30]). The neutron skin difference between 96 Zr and 96 Ru comes from the neutron-proton asymmetry in nuclear matter equation of state (EOS), which is encoded by the symmetry energy [31][32][33].…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The density slope parameter of the symmetry energy is fitted to be 𝐿 (𝜌 𝑐 ) = 47.3 MeV at a subsatruration cross density 𝜌 𝑐 = 0.11𝜌 0 /0.16 0.11 fm −3 [35][36][37]. The DFT calculation with the same model parameters give a neutron skin Δ𝑟 np = 0.190 fm for the benchmark 208 Pb nucleus [30]. However, the recent PREX-II measurement using parity-violating electroweak interactions has yielded a large neutron skin thickness of the 208 Pb nucleus Δ𝑟 np = 0.283 ± 0.071 fm [38], leading to a larger density slope parameter 𝐿 (𝜌 𝑐 ) = 71.5 ± 22.6 MeV [39], at tension with the world data established by strong interaction means.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ∆r 96 np (Zr) and ∆r 96 np (Ru) are also very interesting since a recent study [52] has demonstrated that the isobaric 96 Zr+ 96 Zr and 96 Ru+ 96 Ru collisions at relativistic energies can be used to extract the ∆r np of 96 Zr and 96 Ru with a weak model-dependence. The ∆r 96 np (Zr) and ∆r 96 np (Ru) are also crucial for the chiral magnetic effect search in isobaric collisions [53].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neutron skin of nuclei as an important fundamental property has attracted much attentions in traditional low energy heavy-ion physics and nuclear astrophysics [1][2][3][4][5]. Very recently the neutron skin effect was also recognized even in relativistic heavy-ion collision [6][7][8][9]. The neutron skin is usually defined as the difference between the root-mean-squared (rms) radii of neutrons and protons, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%