2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.89.052002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing the radio emission from air showers with polarization measurements

Abstract: The emission of radio waves from air showers has been attributed to the so-called geomagnetic emission process. At frequencies around 50 MHz this process leads to coherent radiation which can be observed with rather simple setups. The direction of the electric field induced by this emission process depends only on the local magnetic field vector and on the incoming direction of the air shower. We report on measurements of the electric field vector where, in addition to this geomagnetic component, another compo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
96
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Proof for a contribution of charge excess was found by CODALEMA [32] and later by polarization studies of AERA [25] and LOFAR [26]. CROME [33] and ANITA [34] detected GHz emission at the Cherenkov angle, which can be interpreted as relativistic compression of the airshower radio emission.…”
Section: B Experimental Statusmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Proof for a contribution of charge excess was found by CODALEMA [32] and later by polarization studies of AERA [25] and LOFAR [26]. CROME [33] and ANITA [34] detected GHz emission at the Cherenkov angle, which can be interpreted as relativistic compression of the airshower radio emission.…”
Section: B Experimental Statusmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The relative contribution of charge excess to the total emission depends on the geometry (angle to the geomagnetic field, zenith angle, observer position, etc.) and has typical values of 5%-20% of the total pulse amplitude [24][25][26].…”
Section: A Emission Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D-plots generated by MAXIMA for arbitrarily assumed frequency spectrum of artificially generated pulse by iFFT with 4 peaks above the threshold (corresponding to 17.12, 40.9, 65.2 and 90.7 MHz, respectively, left graph) and for with only 2 peaks (corresponding to 40.9 and 65.2 MHz, respectively, right graph). The axis x corresponds to the frequency range from 0 to 100 MHz, the axis y denotes time evolution, the axis z is in arbitrarily units corresponding to (6). signal power simultaneously for time and frequency.…”
Section: Two Dimensional Triggermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second component is polarized radially with respect to the axis of the air shower and results from the negative charge excess in the shower front [9,10,11,12]. Its relative strength is on average 14% at the Auger site for an air shower arriving perpendicular to the geomagnetic field [13]. The constructive and destructive interference of the two emission processes lead to a radial asymmetry of the lateral signal distribution function (LDF) [14,15,16] that can be modeled with a two-dimensional LDF [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%