2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probiotic use as prophylaxis for Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a community hospital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hudson et al retrospectively evaluated prophylactic probiotic use in patients receiving broadspectrum antibiotics for at least 3 days. In the 2.5-year study period, 5574 hospital encounters were reviewed and showed a C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) incidence rate of 0.96% in patients who received probiotics compared to 2.19% in patients who did not receive probiotics (p = 0.007; number needed to treat of 88) [6]. A 2018 meta-analysis and systematic review by McFarland et al evaluated three randomized controlled trials and seven observational studies, and showed a reduced incidence rate of CDI with use of Bio-K+ ® for primary prevention of CDI [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hudson et al retrospectively evaluated prophylactic probiotic use in patients receiving broadspectrum antibiotics for at least 3 days. In the 2.5-year study period, 5574 hospital encounters were reviewed and showed a C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) incidence rate of 0.96% in patients who received probiotics compared to 2.19% in patients who did not receive probiotics (p = 0.007; number needed to treat of 88) [6]. A 2018 meta-analysis and systematic review by McFarland et al evaluated three randomized controlled trials and seven observational studies, and showed a reduced incidence rate of CDI with use of Bio-K+ ® for primary prevention of CDI [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probiotic supplementation has been shown to reduce the risk of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and variable effects on primary CDI [6][7][8][9][10]. Due to conflicting and insufficient data, often due to poor quality studies, routine use is not recommended per the 2018 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been done to understand the potential use of probiotics in treating CDI. More extensive studies are needed to better understand the probiotics’ role in CDI prevention due to inconsistent results [ 98 , 99 , 100 , 122 ]. A study by Allen et al showed that probiotic usage did not have any significant benefit in the prevention of CDI [ 99 ].…”
Section: Therapeutical Strategies Against CDImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, another study by Heil et al also showed similar results, whereas a multi-year study showed no significant difference when high-CDI-risk patients were given probiotic supplements [ 100 ]. Several studies have shown the benefits of probiotics in treating CDI [ 122 , 123 , 124 ]. A study by Hudson et al showed that patients receiving probiotic supplements and antibiotics had a lower incidence of CDI-associated diarrhea than those who did not receive the probiotic supplements [ 122 ].…”
Section: Therapeutical Strategies Against CDImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to clindamycin, fluoroquinolones, and beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations has been associated with the highest risk as compared to macrolides, sulfonamides, and penicillin [ 6 ]. On the contrary, some pharmaco-epidemiologic studies have shown a protective effect from statins and probiotics, but this issue remains controversial [ 10 , 11 ]. Recent studies suggest that acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors is correlated with an increased incidence of Cdiff infection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%