2022
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014257.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probiotics for treatment of chronic constipation in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other non-pharmacological treatment options such as prebiotics and probiotics, symbiotics, biofeedback, massage therapy, and alternative medicine have not shown to significantly improve defecation frequency [ 89 ]. A recent Cochrane review included 14 studies investigating the role of probiotics and concluded that there is insufficient evidence to recommend probiotics in successfully treating or changing the frequency of defecation [ 90 ].…”
Section: Are There Useful Non-pharmacological Therapies?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other non-pharmacological treatment options such as prebiotics and probiotics, symbiotics, biofeedback, massage therapy, and alternative medicine have not shown to significantly improve defecation frequency [ 89 ]. A recent Cochrane review included 14 studies investigating the role of probiotics and concluded that there is insufficient evidence to recommend probiotics in successfully treating or changing the frequency of defecation [ 90 ].…”
Section: Are There Useful Non-pharmacological Therapies?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It showed no difference in health outcomes or adverse effects of probiotics/synbiotics compared with placebo treatments. As such, insufficient evidence exists to link probiotics to improved outcomes for pediatric FC [33].…”
Section: Probioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional constipation (FC) is defined as constipation without organic etiology (Sperber et al., 2021 ), and it is a common disorder in children and adults (Wallace et al., 2022 ). The prevalence has been found to be 15.3% in studies that define FC according to Rome I criteria, 11.2% in studies using Rome II, 11.4% in studies using Rome III, and 10.1% in studies using Rome IV criteria (Barberio et al., 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%