2010
DOI: 10.1080/03610920903377799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probit and Logit Model Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen and Tsurumi (2010) use Monte Carlo experiments to help select between probit and logit models for binary variables. They find that if unbalanced binary data is generated by a leptokurtic distribution (highly peaked with fat tails) a logit model is preferable to a probit model.10 Note that the logarithm of odds of r i,t.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen and Tsurumi (2010) use Monte Carlo experiments to help select between probit and logit models for binary variables. They find that if unbalanced binary data is generated by a leptokurtic distribution (highly peaked with fat tails) a logit model is preferable to a probit model.10 Note that the logarithm of odds of r i,t.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen and Tsurumi (2011) reported the difficulty of distinguishing Probit and Logit models. The authors suggest that this is only possible with a relevant number of samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survival curves were set up with the data obtained from the probability of germination during the time of longevity analysis. For transformation of the survival curve in the Probit and Logit linear scales, equations (2) and (3) were used, respectively Chen and Tsurumi (2011). where Ф is the normal density curve and x is the probability of germination transformed into equivalent percentage indices ranging from 0 to 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have also described how our work may be placed within the familiar GLMM framework. While it is beyond the scope of this paper to thoroughly discuss model selection problems involving, e.g., covariance structures or link functions, it is the author's hope that previous and ongoing GLM and GLMM research (e.g., Chen & Tsurumi, 2010) can be used to build upon the proposed work in this area. Further, while we have shown practical operationalizations of the proposed method for binary data in Section 2.6, we leave it for future work to describe the specifics of sophisticated covariance structures (i.e., H •,t 's that are more complicated than I n ) for other data types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%