Problem‐Based Learning at the Harvard School of Dental Medicine: Self‐Assessment of Performance in Postdoctoral Training

Abstract

Problem-based learning (PBL) was implemented into the dental curriculum at the Harvard School of Dental Medicine (HSDM) in 1994 with an expectation that this pedagogy would enhance students' critical thinking and communication skills as well as general professional competencies. Previous studies have described several aspects of the outcome of PBL curricula at the predoctoral level. However, there is no information available on the perceptions and performance of PBL graduates during their postdoctoral training in dentistry. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of PBL methodology on the performance of HSDM graduates during their postdoctoral training in comparison with their non-HSDM (traditional) co-residents. Surveys containing traditional knowledge-based criteria, preclinical and clinical criteria, and PBL criteria were sent to HSDM graduates from the classes of 2002 through 2004 who were in postgraduate training programs. The HSDM and traditional graduates were asked to evaluate and compare their performance in selected areas with those of their co-residents from either a PBL curriculum or a traditional curriculum. The directors of each program were also asked to assess HSDM graduates relative to other graduates in the program based on the same aspects. Overall, HSDM graduates rated themselves more highly than non-HSDM graduates on all competencies. No significant difference between HSDM and non-HSDM responses was found in general dental knowledge, specialty specific knowledge, preclinical skills, clinical skills, communication with staff, and patient education, whereas significant differences (p<0.05) were found for communication with patients, critical thinking, independent learning, performance in small group settings, self-assessment, and teamwork. The data obtained from the program directors revealed corresponding results. The HSDM graduates' capacity for independent learning was rated as "excellent" by 65.31 percent of the directors and 80.95 percent of the HSDM graduates themselves. These findings suggest that the performance of HSDM graduates during their postdoctoral training met expectations and were similar to non-HSDM graduates for traditional residency program competencies. However, the PBL training appears to provide HSDM graduates with enhanced abilities in independent learning, communication, and cooperation skills.Dr. Thammasitboon is an Instructor,

Self-perceived preparedness of dental school graduates and the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on their confidence

“…This conforms with other studies which demonstrated the effectiveness of PBL in enhancing students' abilities in independent learning, communication and cooperation skills such as the ability to work and plan e ciently. 5,13 On the other hand, half of the participants agreed that competency-based assessment was a good educational and grading tool. According to the authors, competency assessment can be a stressful grading tool for the students due to the pass/fail nature of it yielding to less percentage of agreement.…”

O uso da aprendizagem baseada em problemas na Odontologia: uma revisão crítica da literatura

“…Além disso, os alunos se sentem mais preparados para a vida profissional. Isto pode ser relacionado à rotina de aprendizagem dos alunos com a PBL, pois os mesmos vivenciam a resolução de problemas desde o início de sua formação 16,20 . Não houve diferença na educação permanente entre os estudos, pois os alunos buscavam igualmente cursos de pósgraduação.…”

“…O desempenho dos diplomados em PBL durante a sua formação de pós-doutorado correspondeu às expectativas e foram semelhantes aos nãograduados para competências tradicionais do programa de residência. No entanto, a formação PBL parece fornecer aos graduados habilidades aprimoradas em aprendizagem independente, comunicação e habilidades de cooperação 16 .…”

Validation method of research instruments for Dental Radiology curriculum study

“…Also, very few discuss the validation process and the steps taken [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] . Among the studies that do, very little information is given describing how the process was executed [30][31][32][33][34][35] . This occurs mainly in quantitative studies that utilize surveys, possibly because this design is more widely used and understood than qualitative instruments in health studies.…”