An attempt was made to ameliorate the deficit in performance shown by septal rats on the Maier three-table task by using either a distinctive visual stimulus insert as a discriminative cue to the route to the daily locus of the food table (Experiment 1) or distinctive visual inserts merely to mark the spatiallocation of each table and the runway leading to that table from the choice point (Experiment 2). When a single stimulus insert consistently identified the food table and the runway to it, regardless of its location in the room, then septals did not differ from shams, and both septals and shams performed better than comparable animals not given the exploratory experience. When the stimulus inserts merely identified the spatiallocation of each table and its corresponding runway, then septals still were impaired relative to normals. More importantly, the fact that normals could perform successfully in Experiment 2 only when they had received a prior exploratory experience indicated that highlighting the spatial location of each table and its runway with a distinctive intramaze stimulus marker does not alter the qualitative character of the three-table task as one requiring spatial integration.A number of neurobehavioral studies (Ellen & Weston, 1983;Herrmann, Black, Anchel, & Ellen, 1978;Herrmann, Black, Doherty, & Ellen, 1980;Rabe & Haddad, 1969;Stahl & Ellen, 1973, 1979 have shown that damage to the septal-hippocampal complex and its interconnections produces profound and long-lasting deficits in performance on the Maier three-table task (Maier, 1932). It will be recalled that on this task animals are required to integrate information concerning the spatial relations existing among the three tables with information concerning the daily locus of food. Each day, the start and food tables are changed so that the animals never learn a particular route to the food or a particular location ofthe food.Despite the marked successes that have been achieved with operant tasks in the attenuation of septal-lesioninduced deficits by means of an external cue that indicates when to respond (Braggio & Ellen, 1976;Ellen & Butter, 1969;Kelsey & Grossman, 1971), a comparable improvement in performance has not been achieved when an external cue is used to signal the locus of the food table in the three-table task. Herrmann et al. (1980) have shown that when a cue light was placed on the feeding table during both the feeding experience and the test trial, septal animals were still unable to return directly to the food table on the test trial.It should be noted that, in the three-table task, the use of the cue light to signal the bai ted table isThe contributions of the following people to the various parts of this study are gratefully acknowledged: Martha Blanc, John CuJlom, Cynthia Johnson, Salvador Macias, and Betty Soteres. The authors' mailing address is: Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, University Plaza, Atlanta, GA 30303.133 not comparable to that of the operant task. In the operant chamber, the cue light...