2002
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-36943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probleme der Kunstlinsenberechnung nach photorefraktiver Keratektomie bei hoher Myopie

Abstract: After corneal refractive surgery, various techniques to determine the current corneal power should be compared and the value around which results tend to cluster should be relied on to avoid hyperopia after cataract surgery with lens implantation. In those cases where keratometry and refraction before PRK/LASIK are available, the gold standard is still to subtract the change of the SEQ at the corneal plane from the preoperative central keratometric power, although in the present case report the subtraction of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All the articles in English published through December 2003 were reviewed and were included if there were sufficient data to apply the R factor, CHM, and DKM. 7,[14][15][16][17] For this reason, the sample comprised only 19 eyes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All the articles in English published through December 2003 were reviewed and were included if there were sufficient data to apply the R factor, CHM, and DKM. 7,[14][15][16][17] For this reason, the sample comprised only 19 eyes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6] For this reason, if a patient who had refractive surgery develops a cataract, using the actual K-readings with the current formulas, the power of the IOL will be underestimated and the patient will be at risk for hyperopia. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] To overcome this problem, 3 main techniques have been proposed: historical methods (HM), contact lenses, and the so-called true corneal power method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past few years, increasing attention has been given to this problem. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Three main sources of error have been identified. 16 First, curvature measurements are erroneous because they are not obtained from the corneal center (radius error).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ausschlusskriterien waren Voroperationen, chronische Augenerkrankungen, Augenentzündungen, Z. n. Hornhautverletzungen sowie Netzhauterkrankungen. [5,11,12].…”
Section: Methodenunclassified