2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-46126-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems and Pitfalls in Understanding the Clactonian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While many are unmistakable (figures 6 and 8), and all contain multiple features indicative of being human made, we recognize that the fluvial deposition of these artefacts may mean a number (most likely smaller examples) could potentially be formed by non-anthropogenic processes. Smith [2] suggested that 'Clactonian' flakes, which we interpret to mean larger flake tools (in line with historical perceptions of these artefacts [60]) were previously found. Following Roe [5], we have not yet found any evidence of such tools.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…While many are unmistakable (figures 6 and 8), and all contain multiple features indicative of being human made, we recognize that the fluvial deposition of these artefacts may mean a number (most likely smaller examples) could potentially be formed by non-anthropogenic processes. Smith [2] suggested that 'Clactonian' flakes, which we interpret to mean larger flake tools (in line with historical perceptions of these artefacts [60]) were previously found. Following Roe [5], we have not yet found any evidence of such tools.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Search effort could be considered unbalanced between Acheulean and earlier flake‐and‐core‐only assemblages as handaxes are more easily recognised (and thus discovered). This is unavoidable, but search effort for expedient technologies has also been considerable in both northern and southern Europe (e.g., see discussions on the Clactonian and eoliths 79,80,81 ).…”
Section: Optimal Linear Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%