1985
DOI: 10.1016/0732-8893(85)90005-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems associated with serotyping strains of Ureaplasma urealyticum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
48
1
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
48
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the results of gene-based methods are expected to be more easily reproducible than those of phenotyping, experience has taught us that typing cloned, laboratory-adapted strains is much easier than working with wildtype isolates (26). The serotyped isolates that were mba genotyped in this study emphasize this lesson.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Although the results of gene-based methods are expected to be more easily reproducible than those of phenotyping, experience has taught us that typing cloned, laboratory-adapted strains is much easier than working with wildtype isolates (26). The serotyped isolates that were mba genotyped in this study emphasize this lesson.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Similar to the species debate, there are numerous conflicting studies attempting to link a specific serovar with disease. This is further confounded through the use of flawed serotyping methodologies, many of which were reported shortly after the conception of the original serotyping scheme and showed multiple cross-reactions among individual serovars (9). Despite efforts to improve on this (10), disparities in serotyping methodologies have not been suitably resolved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between serovars and disease syndromes needs to be studied further (Grattard et al, 1995 ;Naessens et al, 1988). However, this has been limited by technical difficulties and cross-reactions associated with serotyping (Wiley & Quinn, 1984 ;Quinn et al, 1981 ;Robertson & Stemke, 1979 ;Stemke & Robertson, 1985), even when monoclonal antibodies were used (Naessens et al, 1998 CTG GTT TTG TTT CAA AAC CTA T427 UMA2A2* UU A\B 6 6 454CAC TTC CTG GTT TTG TTT CAA AAC431 UMA2A* UU A 66 479CCA CTT CCT GGT TTT GTA GTT TC457 UMA10A* UU B 68 479CCA CTT CCT GGT TGT GTA GTT GA457 UMA4A1* UU C 68 452TT GCC TGG TTG TGT TTC GAA CTC430 UMA4A2* UU C 68 454CAT TGC CTG GTT GTG TTT CGA AC432 UMA9A1* UU D 66 460CTG GAG TTG GTG TAG GCG CAT440 UMA9A2* UU D 66 462TTC TGG AGT TGG TGT AGG CGC442 UMA7A1 UU E 74 245GTA ATT GCA ACA TGG AAT TCA GTT TCA219 UMA7A2* UU E 66 458GGT TCT GGT GTA TGA GTG CTT TT436 UMA7A3* UU E 66 461GTT GGT TCT GGT GTA TGA GTG C440 * Primers designed specifically for this study. All others have been previously published (see text for references).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%