Workshop on Non-Perturbative Quantum Chromodynamics 1983
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-5619-9_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems at the Interface between Perturbative and Nonperturbative Quantum Chromodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that when b → 0 (or better when M G ≫ b) Φ AS (z) → δ(z); for light mesons, like e.g. the pion, and reasonable values of b ∼ 0.5 − 1.0 GeV, Φ AS (z) is very similar to the well known asymptotic distribution amplitude [14]. With these choices for the glueball distribution amplitude, all integrals Ψ l,m,n (y), Eq.…”
Section: Decay Rates and Angular Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Notice that when b → 0 (or better when M G ≫ b) Φ AS (z) → δ(z); for light mesons, like e.g. the pion, and reasonable values of b ∼ 0.5 − 1.0 GeV, Φ AS (z) is very similar to the well known asymptotic distribution amplitude [14]. With these choices for the glueball distribution amplitude, all integrals Ψ l,m,n (y), Eq.…”
Section: Decay Rates and Angular Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In the framework of perturbative QCD and its factorization theorems for exclusive hadronic processes at high energy scales [14] (in our case, the QQ bound-state mass, M Q ), the helicity amplitudes A λγ ,λG;λQ for the physical process may be evaluated starting from the helicity amplitudes for the elementary hard process QQ → γg * g * , T λγ ,λ1,λ2;λQ,λQ , where λ 1 , λ 2 are the helicities of the two final (virtual) gluons.…”
Section: Description Of the Formalism And General Results For Helmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We separate the quark-counting model of Brodsky, Farrar, and independently Matveev et al [10] from the asymptotic short distance (asd) model of Brodsky and Lepage [11,12]. The earlier theory is one of counting propagators and the number of scattered constituents.…”
Section: Definitions and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underlying this is the fact of perturbative calculability of short-transverse distance not being on the same footing as perturbative models of the x → 1 dependence. For instance Brodsky and Lepage [11,12] discuss the endpoint x → 1 contribution of the proton form factor F 1 . The authors argue that for the limit x 1 → 1, pQCD implies an m = 0 wave function of order α 2 s perturbatively calculated to go like (1 − x 1 ) 1 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%