Spigelius, if he, as fome learned men afiert, had pronoune'd the gall-bladder to be " large in dyfenteric bodies," whereas he has only faid, that he had " fre-" quently"feen itfo (j>). Yet, if we examine this whole fedtion narrowly, we lhall fee it obferv'd but once by others. For Cummenus (j), was the onlyperfon W c. 10. (/) c. 7. _ (m) hxercit. de gland, in duodeno. 4. 6. («) N. i. L 2 (») Schol. ad obf. 4. C) N. 13. (/) De hum. corp. f.ibr. 1. 8. c. 13. (?) Obf. .. who j6 Book III. Of Di(cafes of the Belly. who found " the gall-bladder to be very large, and very full of bile," and in the body of a woman. Bontius (r), and 1 aunonjeims (j), found it to be diftended indeed ; but the latter with pU3, and the former with a white hu¬ mour, " like a pultice offtarch, lb that no traces of bile were lef t," where¬ as Spigelius has declar'd, that the increas'd fize of it was owing to " the « quantity of bile, with which it was fill'd." But Francifcus f'laterus (/), not only found it not diftended with bile, as others likewile feem to have found it, who fay nothing upon the fubjedt, but even " quite empty." Moreover, the patient of Platerus had the inteftines ulcerated, after a dyfentery, which continued " tome days " and this 1 obferve, left you ihould be apt to imagine, that this did not happen, but after dyfenteries of long continuance. And there were innumerable little ulcers, for they took up the whole extent of furface in the ileum, and were " the breadth of " three fingers diftant from each other-," I'o that this obfervation may be, in fome meafure, compar'd with the obfervation of the celebrated Ballius («), who, after a dyfentery, faw the fame inteftine diftinguifti'd with ulcers, " at the diftance of almoft a finger's breadth from each other, and " fometimes, at the diftance of a joint of the thumb, proceeding nearly in " one traft, or feries," as the figure which he added (.v), has alio exprtfs'd (except that he feems rather to have reprefented the jejunum, than the ileum) confirming the defcription, in which the fame opinions, of Peyerus, that I pointed out a little while ago, are ftrengthen'd by a probable conjecture, I mean that, as thofe bodies, which he call'd glandular plexuftes, were want¬ ing, and as every ulcer leem'd to occupy one of the feats of thefe glandular plexuftes, it was very fuppol'able, that the beginnings of the erofions, had been in the fame plexuftes, which were, at length, entirely confum'd. Nay, indeed Brunnerus, in that oblervation (y), wherein he nu.mber'd more than fixty little ulcers, has teftified that thefe ulcers, " had their fituation in no other part, than in thefe plexufles." And certainly, that in inteftinal fluxes, the humours are thrown upon the inteftines, by thefe, or other glands, may be even argued from their magnitude being increas'd, as hap¬ pens in all other glands whatever, while their fecretions are greater than ufual. Thus in the body, wherein, after a long inteftinal flux, the fame Brunnerus found ulcers, about the extremity of the jejunum (2), he not only law ...