Problems in Jacobean Administration: Was Henry Howard, Earl of Northampton, A Reformer?

Peck, Linda Levy

doi:10.1017/s0018246x00010736

Hist. J.

1976

DOI: 10.1017/s0018246x00010736

|View full text |Cite

Problems in Jacobean Administration: Was Henry Howard, Earl of Northampton, A Reformer?

Linda Levy Peck

Abstract: IComplaints about corrupt administrative practices were endemic to the Tudor-Stuart state. During the reign of James I, however, the issue of corruption was transformed from a staple of political discourse to an issue which not only aggravated administrative problems but also undermined the crown's very legitimacy. With the impeachment in 1621 of James'lord 1 I should like to thank Professors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1986

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

The Last Years of the First Earl of Salisbury, 1610–1612

Lindquist¹

1986

Albion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is generally assumed that the earl of Salisbury's last years were a time of political decline, largely because of the failure of the Great Contract. “In 1610,” one historian has written recently, “Salisbury lost the confidence of both king and Parliament. The collapse of the Great Contract, in which so much of his credit was bound up, was a blow from which his prestige never recovered.” The outlines of the story are familiar. Salisbury, lord treasurer since 1608 and James's chief minister since the beginning of the reign, was securely established in the king's trust and affection at the beginning of 1610. His fall began with court opposition to the Great Contract, opposition which it has been suggested may have been the real cause of the contract's failure. According to Godfrey Goodman, a “great peer” on his deathbed advised the kingnot to lose any part of his prerogative, especially the Court of Wards and other great royalties which his predecessors had, for if he should part with these he should hardly be able to govern; that the subject was more obedient and did observe the King more for these than for any laws or other respect whatsoever; that the subject was bound to relieve him and supply his occasions without any such contractings.The dying peer blamed those who “did endeavour to engross and monopolise the King, and kept other able men out of his service.” From that point, according to Goodman, Salisbury, “who had been a great stirrer in that business, and was the man aimed at, began to decline.”

show abstract

The Last Years of the First Earl of Salisbury, 1610–1612

Lindquist¹

1986

Albion

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Problems in Jacobean Administration: Was Henry Howard, Earl of Northampton, A Reformer?

Cited by 1 publication

References 6 publications

The Last Years of the First Earl of Salisbury, 1610–1612

The Last Years of the First Earl of Salisbury, 1610–1612

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About