2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2000.02308.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems In Laboratory Monitoring Of Heparin Dosage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(100 reference statements)
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Certain drawbacks are associated with chromogenic assays such as lack of standardization and high cost [7]. Sample type is also an issue with these assays in that they can only be performed with platelet poor plasma (PPP) and preparation of PPP requires time-consuming pre-analytical procedures resulting in long turnaround times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Certain drawbacks are associated with chromogenic assays such as lack of standardization and high cost [7]. Sample type is also an issue with these assays in that they can only be performed with platelet poor plasma (PPP) and preparation of PPP requires time-consuming pre-analytical procedures resulting in long turnaround times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the standard coagulation monitoring assays such as the activated partial thromboplastin time test (APTT) or the activated clotting time test (ACT) are not sufficiently discriminatory for monitoring LMWHs, suffer from inter-laboratory variability and are lacking in standardization [2,7,8]. LMWHs exert their anticoagulant effect via interaction with the pentasaccharide-binding domain on antithrombin (AT), which in turn enhances the inhibitory effect of AT on factor Xa (FXa) [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta diferença na sensibilidade à heparina leva a uma significativa variabilidade nos resultados de TTPA, que podem ter implicações na prescrição Kitchen et al (1996), com 9 reagentes, e Kitchen et al (1999) Como na maioria dos laboratórios, o monitoramento da terapia com HNF ainda é realizado pelo TTPA, uma série de estudos demonstraram uma correlação entre heparinização inadequada e recorrência de trombose. Como conseqüência direta destas observações a maioria dos laboratórios adotou como intervalo terapêutico valores de relação entre 1,5 a 2,5 para o reagente do TTPA em uso, que corresponde a uma concentração de heparina de 0,2-0,4Unidades/mL baseada nos valores por titulação com protamina ou inibição do fator Xa (EBY, 1997;KITCHEN, 2000). Nelson (1999) mostrou que há diferenças na concentração de heparina quando a determinação é realizada pelos métodos de titulação com a protamina ou inibição do fator Xa.…”
Section: Discussão E Conclusãounclassified
“…The accuracy and precision of this newly developed assay was comparable to that of existing clotting assays in use, resulting in its adaptation as the standard assay for monitoring LMWH [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%