1977
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-2670(01)82288-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems in the determination of plutonium in bioassay and environmental analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an additional check, 140 routine urine samples were taken and analyzed by each method after the samples were divided equally. Also, 54 QC samples were analyzed by the oxalate method and 12 QC samples by the AEP method. The average recovery of the 242Pu spike for 194 samples by the oxalate method was 90.5% with a standard deviation of ±10.1 and a range of 43-111%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As an additional check, 140 routine urine samples were taken and analyzed by each method after the samples were divided equally. Also, 54 QC samples were analyzed by the oxalate method and 12 QC samples by the AEP method. The average recovery of the 242Pu spike for 194 samples by the oxalate method was 90.5% with a standard deviation of ±10.1 and a range of 43-111%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to being very time-consuming, ashing is one of the major causes of erratic results. Veselsky (12) presents a review of the problems of various types of bioassay samples. Lisk (13) points out that sample preparation, ashing, element isolation, and concentration are usually the most critical steps in trace element analysis of biological samples.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various techniques for preparing radioactive sources have been reviewed [3,7], among which electrodeposition, in which a radioactive material dissolved in an electrolyte solution is electrodeposited on a cathode (source support) by passing an electric current, is commonly used to prepare ultrathin solid radioactive sources [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The advantages of this source preparation method include high deposition yields (99.8%) and high qualities of the sources obtained with simple and inexpensive equipment [7], which make it the most common method of radioactive source preparation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of all the transuranium elements, plutonium has been studied most extensively and numerous procedures have been reported for its determination [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], Current techniques for the determination of plutonium trace level are mainly radiochemical methods (a-spectrometry, y spectrometry, liquid scintillation counting) carried out after chemical preparation of the samples. Interest has also tumed to various mass spectrometry techniques (ICP-MS [10,11], TIMS [12,13]), but those methods are not really adapted for a matrix where uranium is the principal constituent because of isobaric interfering effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%