1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3468(95)90057-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems of neuroblastoma screening for 6 month olds and results of second screening for 18 month olds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Low-cost methods are necessary to satisfy the rising demand for mass screening in childhood (26)(27)(28)(29)(30). In view of its analytical characteristics, our technique could represent a new solution to these requests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-cost methods are necessary to satisfy the rising demand for mass screening in childhood (26)(27)(28)(29)(30). In view of its analytical characteristics, our technique could represent a new solution to these requests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the number of patients that can be detected at a later time gets progressively smaller, and the likelihood of detecting unfavorable tumors in the window between detectability by screening and clinically symptomatic is small. It will take pilot data from a later screen in Japan or Europe to address these important questions [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1985, mass screening commenced as a nationwide program throughout Japan and, in 1988, screening by quantitative measurement of VMA, HVA, and creatinine was recommended by the Ministry of Health and Welfare. Since then, more than 7 million children have been screened in Japan, and more than 650 cases of neuroblastoma have been detected [5,7,28,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. There are numerous reports on screening from the various prefectures and time periods in Japan focusing on different aspects, making it a challenge to interpret the nationwide experience.…”
Section: Japanese Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in some areas, a second screening was started aiming to rescue the false-negative cases. Hayashi et al [31] reported 40 cases receiving the first screening in Miyagi Prefecture in May 1992; 20 cases were positive, while 18 cases were false negative. Only 5 of 18 falsenegative cases were alive without the disease.…”
Section: Screening Failuresmentioning
confidence: 99%