Stability Theory 1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-10648-7_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems of the Mechanics of Rigid Bodies and of Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to validate the two lowest frequencies and decaying rates of a cantilever micro-beam with end subtangential force in the absence of the material gradient index, material length scale parameter, and piezoelectric layers, Figure 3(a) and (b) is plotted for imaginary and real parts of eigenvalue versus the follower force, respectively, and compared with those given by Leipholz (2013). It is evident that for the range 0 P 20 , the real part of eigenvalue vanishes, while the first mode of the imaginary parts of the lowest eigenvalues increases and the second mode decreases, and they join together as P tends toward P cr = 20 and imaginary part of eigenvalue reaches to Im ( Ω ) = 11 . 03 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to validate the two lowest frequencies and decaying rates of a cantilever micro-beam with end subtangential force in the absence of the material gradient index, material length scale parameter, and piezoelectric layers, Figure 3(a) and (b) is plotted for imaginary and real parts of eigenvalue versus the follower force, respectively, and compared with those given by Leipholz (2013). It is evident that for the range 0 P 20 , the real part of eigenvalue vanishes, while the first mode of the imaginary parts of the lowest eigenvalues increases and the second mode decreases, and they join together as P tends toward P cr = 20 and imaginary part of eigenvalue reaches to Im ( Ω ) = 11 . 03 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remarkably, linearization in [57] reduces to the classical Beck column [30] with an external damping [107], where the acceleration term is neglected. Ling et al [99] extended the nonlinear model by including a distributed follower load as in the classical Leipholz column [33,108] and allowing three-dimensional perturbations to the non-deformed filament. As a result, bifurcations to both planar flapping states and non-planar spinning motions have been found, reminiscent of the cone-like beating motion of cilia [99].…”
Section: Flutter In Biology At Different Scales (A) Motility and Prop...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the many, the following ones are recalled (figure 2): Reut’s double pendulum [29], differing from the ‘Ziegler’s double pendulum’ only in the load application. More specifically, the constant magnitude load P slides along a rigid bar to maintain its application line always coincident with the undeformed state;Beck’s column [30], an elastic cantilever rod differing from the ‘Ziegler’s double pendulum’ only for the continuous and uniform distribution of mass, bending stiffness and dissipation;Pflüger’s column [31,32], which enhances the Beck’s column by considering the presence of a lumped mass at the application point of the follower load;Leipholz’s column [33,34], an elastic cantilever rod subject to a uniform distribution of follower tangential load acting along its axis;Nicolai’s column [35,36], an elastic cantilever rod with a follower twist load applied at the free end, so that three-dimensional motion is realized, instead of a planar one.Interestingly, these structural models do not only display flutter instability but, similarly to the ‘Ziegler’s double pendulum’, also counterintuitive behaviours, often referred as ‘paradoxes’ [3749].
Figure 2Discrete and continuous structural models displaying flutter instability when subject to non-conservative loads.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system appears as a generalization of the n-DOF Ziegler column where the load parameter is itself distributed on the system and may vary on each joint. It also may be considered as a discretized Leipholz column [Leipholz 1987]. In this case, the geometric degree of nonconservativity increases with the number of bars and the degree of freedom.…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%