1986
DOI: 10.1016/0550-3213(86)90601-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems with finite density simulations of lattice QCD

Abstract: We present a discussion of problems that have arisen in attempts to understand the behavior of lattice QCD at high densities. The effects observed in the lattice simulations do not seem to bc consistent with what we expect from the usual ideas of chiral symmetry breaking. In particular, at zero quark mass, there does not seem to be a massive baryon at finite density.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
177
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
11
177
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since µγ 0 is Hermitian, the Dirac operator as a whole is non-Hermitian. As a consequence, the eigenvalues are scattered in the complex plane [79]. The fermion determinant is in general complex.…”
Section: Qcd At Nonzero Chemical Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since µγ 0 is Hermitian, the Dirac operator as a whole is non-Hermitian. As a consequence, the eigenvalues are scattered in the complex plane [79]. The fermion determinant is in general complex.…”
Section: Qcd At Nonzero Chemical Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The eigenvalues form a connected droplet in the z-plane for µ < µ c , and split to 2 symmetric droplets for µ > µ c restoring chiral symmetry [9,10]. Similar droplets follow from the QCD Dirac spectra at finite µ on the lattice [15]. In the spontaneously broken phase, all droplets are connected and symmetric about the real-axis…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Specifically, at finite µ the Dirac spectrum on the lattice is complex [15]. The matrix models at finite µ [9,11] capture this essential aspect of the lattice spectra and the nature of the chiral phase transition [1,13,14].…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free energy density defined through the average of the modulus differs from the complete one by means of the phase contribution (1). With N independent configurations the best we can do is to evaluate e iφ ∆ with an error of the order of O( 1 √ N ).…”
Section: Strong Coupling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mean field). In this limit they predict a strong first order saturation transition at a value for the chemical potential significantly smaller than one third of the baryon mass [1] (as one could naively expect considering the quarks confined inside hadrons but ignoring their binding energy). The inclusion of some β dependence in analytical calculations indicates that the mean field critical density and 1 3 m B converge toward a common limit in the physically relevant scaling region [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%