Problems with Past Participles Agreement in French and Italian Dialects

Brown, Becky

doi:10.1515/9783112420140-005

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Finally, note that the difference between avoir-and être-contexts with respect to the importance of the linear order factor leads us to the preliminary conclusion (to be expanded in section 3) that we are in fact dealing with two different rules which underlie standard French PPA: one is based on linear order (agreement in constructions with avoir with preceding clitics or wh-marked elements), some-|| 2 In earlier stages of French (Old French, see Dupuis 1992) and Italian as well as in some modern Romance varieties (e.g. in Catalan, Brown 1988) one can also find PPA with an in-situ internal argument of an active transitive verb. See Legendre (2017) for an overview of PPA-patterns in Romance.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Past participle agreement in French – one or two rules?

Georgi¹,

Stark²

2020

Formal Approaches to Romance Morphosyntax

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Past participle agreement in French has been taken to be conditioned (among other factors) by movement of the internal argument out of the VP, i.e. as a reflex of movement. However, drawing on data that have been neglected so far in the formal literature on the topic (Lahousse 2011), we show that this characterization is in part misguided: past participle agreement is also possible with in-situ internal arguments of unaccusative/passive verbs (that combine with the perfect auxiliary être), and hence cannot generally be considered a reflex of movement. We argue that a unified analysis of all past participle contexts in French is not only difficult -the sole attempt at a uniform analysis of a very similar pattern in Italian by D'Alessandro and Roberts ( 2008) cannot be extended to French -but also undesirable, because past participle agreement in contexts with the auxiliary avoir differs in a number of properties compared to past participle agreement in contexts that require the auxiliary être. We thus argue that past participle agreement in French is in fact not a homogeneous phenomenon but results from two different mechanisms: agreement between the past participle and the internal argument in its base position (not in a Spec-head configuration as is usually assumed), or from resumption (following a suggestion by Boeckx 2003).

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%