Problems with the interpretation of the<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts /><mml:none /><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>ground state

Grigorenko, L. V.; Zhukov, M. V.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.77.034611

Cited by 45 publications

(157 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

142

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…An excited state is found at 4 MeV, which can be attributed to a 2 + resonance. The 8 He-n scattering length is determined to be only a s =−3.17 (66) fm, in accordance with the predictions made in [63]. Further Gamov states at 1.33 and 2.42 MeV have been adopted from an earlier multinucleon transfer experiment [67].…”

Section: Across the Drip-line: 10 Hesupporting

confidence: 80%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Halo nuclei, stepping stones across the drip-lines

Simon

2013

Phys. Scr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Across the Drip-line: 10 Hesupporting

confidence: 80%

“…It has also been shown [63] that the strength of interaction observed in 9 He = 8 He + n strongly affects the ground-state properties of 10 He. It turns out that the interpretation of the observed broad structures in the measured energy spectra requires additional information, e.g.…”

Section: Across the Drip-line: 10 Hementioning

confidence: 99%

Halo nuclei, stepping stones across the drip-lines

Simon

2013

Phys. Scr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Our recent measurement of the 10 He ground state [1] did not support the theoretical explanation for the difference in resonance energy observed in two types of reactions [2]. While a missing mass measurement at Dubna using a (t, p) reaction had reported the ground state to be at 2.1(2) MeV [3], a one-proton removal reaction at GSI from a high-energy 11 Li beam found the ground state to be at a lower energy of 1.54(11) MeV [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 74%

“…While a missing mass measurement at Dubna using a (t, p) reaction had reported the ground state to be at 2.1(2) MeV [3], a one-proton removal reaction at GSI from a high-energy 11 Li beam found the ground state to be at a lower energy of 1.54(11) MeV [4]. Subsequently, Grigorenko and Zhukov showed that the observed peak in the 3-body spectrum of the GSI invariant mass measurement could result from the halo nature of the 11 Li projectile [2], apparently reconciling the descrepancy between the GSI and Dubna results.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Further insights into the reactionBe14(CH2,X)He10
Jones
¹
,
Kohley
²
,
Baumann
³

et al. 2015
Phys. Rev. C
10
0
1
0
View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A previously published measurement of the reaction of a 59 MeV/nucleon 14 Be beam on a deuterated polyethylene target was further analyzed to search for 12 He as well as initial state effects in the population of the 10 He ground state. No evidence for either was found. A lower limit of about 1 MeV was determined for a possible resonance in 12 He. In addition, the 3-body decay energy spectrum of 10 He could not be described by a reaction mechanism calculation based on the halo structure of the initial 14 Be assuming a direct α-particle removal reaction.

show abstract

“…Recently, a missing-mass measurement performed at JINR in Dubna populated 10 He via a (t,p) reaction on 8 He and found the ground state to be at 2.1(2) MeV [1] in contrast to another measurement done at GSI using proton knockout from 11 Li, which found the ground state to be lower at 1.54(11) MeV [2]. It has been suggested by Grigorenko and Zhukov that the observed peak in the 3-body spectrum of the GSI measurement could be shifted by the halo nature of the 11 Li beam [3], apparently reconciling the discrepancy between the Dubna and GSI results.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 85%