1990
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199005000-00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Problems with the Steinbrocker Staging System for Radiographic Assessment of the Rheumatoid Hand and Wrist

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The patients were classified into 4 groups based on radiographic stages of severity, according to the Steinbrocker criteria (32). Since the 4‐stage classification may be ambiguous (33, 34) but the difference between stage I and stages II–IV is distinct (i.e., the absence and presence, respectively, of destructive changes), for the purposes of this study the 4 groups were collapsed into 2, nonerosive RA (Steinbrocker stage I) and erosive RA (Steinbrocker stages II–IV). Blood samples were obtained from all subjects, and genomic DNA and serum were collected using standard protocols and stored at −70°C until use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patients were classified into 4 groups based on radiographic stages of severity, according to the Steinbrocker criteria (32). Since the 4‐stage classification may be ambiguous (33, 34) but the difference between stage I and stages II–IV is distinct (i.e., the absence and presence, respectively, of destructive changes), for the purposes of this study the 4 groups were collapsed into 2, nonerosive RA (Steinbrocker stage I) and erosive RA (Steinbrocker stages II–IV). Blood samples were obtained from all subjects, and genomic DNA and serum were collected using standard protocols and stored at −70°C until use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-sectional data from the baseline evaluation of these patients have been presented in previous reports concerning the joint count (50,51); radiographs (34,35,50,52,53); rheumatoid factor (35); grip strength, walk time, and button time (47); and self-report questionnaire data concerning ADL difficulty (36), pain (49), and helplessness (39,40). These reports include further details concerning methods used for data collection and data management.…”
Section: Patient Assessment At Baseline and 5-year Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no radiographic assessment method has been achieved universal acceptance. In spite of the so-called Steinbrocker's method is not sensitive to clinically meaningful differences, is still widely used in clinical practise (32,35,36) including our Rheumatology Outpatient Department.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%