Procalcitonin levels in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of observational studies

Abstract

BackgroundThe utility of procalcitonin to identify obstetric sepsis is unknown.ObjectiveTo calculate the mean (range) procalcitonin in pregnancy among healthy women not in labor (group 1), healthy women in labor (group 2), and women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) without clinical chorioamnionitis (group 3).Search StrategyNLM PubMed, Elsevier Embase, and Wiley Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to February 21, 2022.Selection CriteriaTen or more pregnant women with procalcitonin reported at more than 20 weeks of pregnancy, with information on labor, PPROM, and infection. Exclusions were major medical comorbidities.Data Collection and AnalysisEach abstract and full‐text review was independently reviewed by the same two authors. Quality was reviewed using the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale. A meta‐analysis was performed using a random effects model.Main ResultsThe systematic review included 25 studies: 10 (40%) of good quality and 15 (60%) of poor quality. The meta‐analysis included 21 studies. Mean procalcitonin in group 1 was 0.092 ng/mL (range 0.036–0.049 ng/mL), in group 2 it was 0.130 ng/mL (range 0.049–0.259 ng/mL), and in group 3 it was 0.345 ng/mL (range 0.005–1.292 ng/mL).ConclusionsAmong healthy pregnant women not in labor, procalcitonin levels are comparable to those in non‐pregnant adults and may be useful in identifying infection. Procalcitonin levels in other groups overlap abnormal values of procalcitonin in non‐pregnant adults, and may not discriminate infection among women in labor or with obstetric comorbidities.ProsperoCRD42020157376, registered 4/28/2020.

Uloga antibiotske terapije u prijevremenom prsnuću plodovih ovoja prije termina na neurološki ishod djece

“…23 There are several studies on procalcitonin as a marker of chorioamnionitis, but the results are controversial and not in favor of procalcitonin as a highly sensitive and specific marker. [24][25][26] Cardiotocographic (CTG) monitoring of the child indicates the presence of tachycardia as a late sign of infection and serves as one of the parameters for establishing the diagnosis of clinical chorioamnionitis. It is necessary to perform a bacteriological smear of the posterior fornix of the vagina and a complete blood count (FBC) weekly.…”