2010
DOI: 10.1644/860.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procapra przewalskii (Artiodactyla: Bovidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only around 350–400 mature individuals are thought to remain [ 1 ]. Their range exists today only in a small area surrounding Qinghai Lake [ 2 , 3 ]. This gazelle’s fate is considered to be even more precarious than the giant panda [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only around 350–400 mature individuals are thought to remain [ 1 ]. Their range exists today only in a small area surrounding Qinghai Lake [ 2 , 3 ]. This gazelle’s fate is considered to be even more precarious than the giant panda [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the tribe, the genus Procapra is an ancient, monophyletic lineage endemic to Asia. Member of this group share unique characteristics, such as the females are hornless and have only rudimentary facial glands 11 12 13 . Procapra split from the Antilopini 11–12 Mya ago 11 14 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PG and TG are flagship ungulates on the QTP, which is characterized by high diversity and endemism of wild ungulates 12 17 18 . Habitat preferences among Procapra gazelles are distinct 13 16 . Generally, TG is considered endemic to the QTP, and lives solely in high-elevation areas (~3000–5750 m) with low temperatures, intense solar radiation, and limited oxygen availability 16 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are fixed (inferentially) heritable differences between species, but not within subspecies of the same species [29]. As noted, the two "subspecies" of Przewalski's gazelle as they were in the early 20th century were diagnosably distinct, with no overlap in the known samples, and both Groves [19] and Leslie et al [22] proposed that the gazelles might be better viewed as distinct species. However, considering the field situation we refer to the type of Przewalski's gazelle as subspecies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that, under the Phylogenetic Species Concept more recently employed by Groves [21], these two "subspecies" would almost certainly rank as distinct species, in that they have nonoverlapping ranges of morphological variation [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%