2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procedural and distributive justice inform subjectivity regarding wind power: A case from Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
22
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Work on community energy treats the tenets of energy justice as separate components of a justice framework (Frate, Brannstrom, de Morais, & Caldeira-Pires, 2019;Gross, 2007;Liebe et al, 2017;Mundaca et al, 2018;Walker & Baxter, 2017b). However, as these findings show, there is a need to treat them as interdependent, meaning that no conclusions can be drawn about one, without drawing conclusions on the others.…”
Section: Conclusion For Theory: Energy Justice Theory Should Expand T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work on community energy treats the tenets of energy justice as separate components of a justice framework (Frate, Brannstrom, de Morais, & Caldeira-Pires, 2019;Gross, 2007;Liebe et al, 2017;Mundaca et al, 2018;Walker & Baxter, 2017b). However, as these findings show, there is a need to treat them as interdependent, meaning that no conclusions can be drawn about one, without drawing conclusions on the others.…”
Section: Conclusion For Theory: Energy Justice Theory Should Expand T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protecting some values and integrating them in design is complicated by the degree of subjectivity involved, such as landscape values and certain livability values [16]. Some of these values are very much individually, and sometimes elusively, conceptualized.…”
Section: Creating Intersubjectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research looking at responses to wind projects from a value point of view has described the values involved in wind energy development [14], theoretically explored the merit of value sensitivity [9], empirically analyzed the values represented in the physical and institutional design of offshore wind [15], and looked into the situatedness of value conflicts of onshore wind [16]. However, to our knowledge, no previous empirical research has put the focus explicitly on design attempts to make wind projects more sensitive to the values of local stakeholders and improve their acceptability, while a focus on design may have unused potential and could be a welcome addition to participative planning strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No contexto brasileiro, as análises geográficas sobre questões energéticas renováveis são preliminares (BRANNSTROM; TRALDI, 2019) e ainda não conseguiram acompanhar o rápido crescimento na capacidade da energia eólica e solar, ambas já instaladas no país (JUÁREZ et al, 2014;AQUILA et al, 2017). No entanto, destacam-se estudos sobre os conflitos sociais gerados entre comunidade e empreendimento eólico (CHAVES et al 2018;DANTAS et al, 2019;FRATE et al, 2019), assim como as abordagens econômico-políticas dos conflitos (MEIRELES, 2011;BRANNSTROM et al, 2017;GORAYEB et al, 2018) e a justificativa das localizações geográficas dos parques eólicos (BRANNSTROM et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified