“…Inductive reasoning, unlike the other learning processes, constitutes itself a cognitive ability to infer rules and generalize from analogies, examples or, "transcending information" (Shute, 1992, p. 20), from simple observation, therefore influencing the success of knowledge acquisition and application (Molnár et al, 2013). Being reasonable to say that the intensity, quality and success of the activation of these processes may constitute factors affecting the quality of any learning, different learning materials most surely require different proportions of those same processes: to acquire vocabulary one recalls associative learning (Zakeri & Khatibi, 2014); to develop mastery in using an algorithm one recalls procedural learning (Knowlton et al, 2017). Inductive reasoning is required to come up with a mathematical formula that resumes a phenomena (Haverty, Koedinger, Klahr, & Alibali, 2000), and metacognition allows one to evaluate the suitability of a chosen strategy (Flavell, 1979) and/or the plausibility of an obtained solution of a problem.…”