2020
DOI: 10.1002/hed.26220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procedural precautions and personal protective equipment during head and neck instrumentation in the COVID‐19 era

Abstract: Background: Otolaryngologists represent a subset of health care workers uniquely vulnerable to COVID-19 transmission. Given the segmentation of extant guidelines concerning precautions and protective equipment for SARS-CoV2, we aimed to provide consolidated recommendations regarding appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) in head neck surgery during the COVID-19 era. Methods: Guidelines published by international and US governing bodieswere reviewed in conjunction with published literature concerning C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of studies within the otorhinolaryngology field assessing the aerosol‐generating potential of procedures involving mucosal surfaces pre‒COVID‐19 made it challenging to understand in an evidence‐based fashion the potential risks of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission associated with instrumentation of the upper airway; that is, whether these procedures may be infectious AGPs. At the early stages of the pandemic, based on the risks of exposure to high viral load mucosal surfaces, 10,11 as well as on the lack of any immunity to SARS‐CoV‐2 and of any vaccines or effective treatments, an array of practice changes to protect health‐care workers and patients were recommended and instituted for otorhinolaryngology procedures involving upper airway mucosal surfaces 9,12‐17 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of studies within the otorhinolaryngology field assessing the aerosol‐generating potential of procedures involving mucosal surfaces pre‒COVID‐19 made it challenging to understand in an evidence‐based fashion the potential risks of SARS‐CoV‐2 transmission associated with instrumentation of the upper airway; that is, whether these procedures may be infectious AGPs. At the early stages of the pandemic, based on the risks of exposure to high viral load mucosal surfaces, 10,11 as well as on the lack of any immunity to SARS‐CoV‐2 and of any vaccines or effective treatments, an array of practice changes to protect health‐care workers and patients were recommended and instituted for otorhinolaryngology procedures involving upper airway mucosal surfaces 9,12‐17 …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Für den Bereich der Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde wird für die folgenden Tätigkeiten ein erhöhtes Risiko durch Aerosolexposition vermutet oder wurde bereits nachgewiesen. Allgemeine Hals-Nasen-Ohren-ärztliche Untersuchung Für die Untersuchung der oberen Luftwege wird ein erhöhtes Infektionsrisiko mit SARS-CoV‑2 beschrieben [ 14 , 30 , 35 ]. Insbesondere bei der starren oder flexiblen Endoskopie der Nase, des Nasenrachenraums, des Oro‑/Hypopharynx und des Larynx wird von einer Aerosolbildung ausgegangen[ 18 , 38 ].…”
Section: Aerosolexposition Und Infektionsrisiken Bei Hals-nasen-ohrenunclassified
“…Medical procedures that increase exposure to respiratory droplets or aerosols have been identified as high-risk for disease transmission. Otolaryngologists and speech-language pathologists by nature of their professions are believed to provide a number of high-risk procedures including aerosol-generating surgeries, 1 , 2 , 3 outpatient nasal and laryngeal endoscopy, 1 , 4 , 5 dysphagia assessment and treatment, 6 and tracheostomy and voice prosthesis management. 7 Concerns and guidelines have been published and regularly updated for such services.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%