2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procedural vulnerability: Understanding environmental change in a remote indigenous community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
91
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
91
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk assessment conventionally focuses on material property or human health and easily marginalises cultural dimensions of risk (although see Göbel, 2001), erasing existential and cosmological risks that have origin in how well people maintain kinship with sentient and responsive phenomena in landscapes and weather (Stoffle and Arnold, 2008;Veland et al, 2013). In setting out to limit risks to Indigenous lives, current discourses of risk, exposure, vulnerability and resilience, like longer-standing discourses of service provision and access, privilege non-Indigenous notions of stability in relationships to place and belonging.…”
Section: Risk Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk assessment conventionally focuses on material property or human health and easily marginalises cultural dimensions of risk (although see Göbel, 2001), erasing existential and cosmological risks that have origin in how well people maintain kinship with sentient and responsive phenomena in landscapes and weather (Stoffle and Arnold, 2008;Veland et al, 2013). In setting out to limit risks to Indigenous lives, current discourses of risk, exposure, vulnerability and resilience, like longer-standing discourses of service provision and access, privilege non-Indigenous notions of stability in relationships to place and belonging.…”
Section: Risk Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, our purpose here is necessarily simultaneously provocative and analytical; philosophical and methodological. Having said that, we also suggest that failure to recognise and respond to the complex simultaneities of people-toenvironment, people-to-people and people-tocosmos relationships in disaster recovery settings risks putting Indigenous communities into harm's way at the behest of racialised, ignorant, or self-interested ideas of what is 'best' for communities and cultures already marginalised and disadvantaged by historical processes of colonial dispossession, continuing occupation, and contemporary exclusion (Howitt, 2012;Veland et al, 2013) (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There are also significant impediments for any social group in using complex climate adaptation information to develop plans unless that information resonates with how they frame the issue (Groffman et al, 2010). Histories and contexts of colonisation also influence how issues are framed (Howitt et al, 2012;Porter & Barry, 2016;Veland et al, 2013). Histories and contexts of colonisation also influence how issues are framed (Howitt et al, 2012;Porter & Barry, 2016;Veland et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%