2000
DOI: 10.1177/104063870001200108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Procedurally Similar Competitive Immunoassay Systems for the Serodiagnosis ofBabesia Equi, Babesia Caballi, Trypanosoma Equiperdum, andBurkholderia MalleiInfection in Horses

Abstract: Abstract. Procedurally similar competitive enzyme-linked immunoassay (cELISA) methods were developed for the serodiagnosis of Babesia equi and Babesia caballi (piroplasmosis), Trypanosoma equiperdum (dourine), and Burkholderia mallei (glanders) infections in horses. Apparent test specificities for the B. equi, B. caballi, T. equiperdum, and B. mallei cELISAs were 99.2%, 99.5%, 98.9%, and 98.9%, respectively. Concordances and kappa values between the complement fixation (CF) and the cELISA procedures for the se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…caballi and anti-B. equi horse sera may be necessary to establish the authenticity of the cross-reaction as well as to determine the appropriate cutoff titers for the practical diagnosis of B. equi and B. caballi in the ELISA (10,11,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…caballi and anti-B. equi horse sera may be necessary to establish the authenticity of the cross-reaction as well as to determine the appropriate cutoff titers for the practical diagnosis of B. equi and B. caballi in the ELISA (10,11,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Rose Bengal plate agglutination test and counterimmunoelectrophoresis technique reported earlier (13,19) either have technical shortcomings or have low specificity and/or sensitivity. Two competitive ELISAs with comparable sensitivity (98.9 and 98.6%) and specificity (100%) were described for glanders diagnosis (14,29). Due to the sophisticated techniques and high costs of mallein and monoclonal antibodies, these competitive ELISAs will not be available in routine laboratories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although IFAT is more sensitive than CFT and rarely renders false negative results FRIEDHOFF, 1986), standardization is difficult, considering the subjectivity of the reader in assessing the results (BÖSE et al, 1995;BRÜNING, 1996). ELISA is nowadays an alternative for increased specificity and sensitivity in the detection of acute and latent babesial infections and several procedures of ELISA using recombinant antigen or crude antigen have been standardized (BALDANI et al, 2007;KUMAR et al, 2003;HIRATA et al, 2003;XUAN et al, 2001;KATZ et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%