Cosmic Ray Conference 1994
DOI: 10.1142/9789814535304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proceedings of the Xxiii International; Cosmic Ray Conference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Alfvén surface is currently the most popular one. However, also the accretion column was proposed (e.g., Leahy 2001 andİnam &Baykal 2005), despite the argument by White et al (1983) that the material in the column may be too hot.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Results and Physical Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Alfvén surface is currently the most popular one. However, also the accretion column was proposed (e.g., Leahy 2001 andİnam &Baykal 2005), despite the argument by White et al (1983) that the material in the column may be too hot.…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Results and Physical Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 4U 1907+09, n H increases to its maximum value after the periastron passage, which implies that the location of the absorbing material is the dense stellar wind of the companion star (Roberts et al 2001). Leahy (2001) and Kostka & Leahy (2010) have modelled the absorption profile according to theoretical wind models. They have proposed that the most probable mechanism for 4U 1907+09 is accretion from a spherical wind with an equatorially enhanced dense spiral stream of gas around the companion star.…”
Section: Spectral Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a Bayesian analysis of 20 years of radio data, Gregory (2002) determined the orbital period P 1 = 26.4960 ± 0.0028 d. The compact object moving around the Be star and interacting with circumstellar matter produces the orbital variability seen in all parts of the spectrum (Taylor et al 1992;Mendelson & Mazeh 1989;Leahy 2001;Grundstrom et al 2007). A Lomb-Scargle timing analysis of 37 years of radio data resulted in the detection of the second period, P 2 = 26.935 ± 0.013 d (Massi & Torricelli-Ciamponi 2016), which is consistent with a previously determined period of morphological changes in the radio structure, mapped in the VLBI images (Massi et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%