The Process of Group Psychotherapy: Systems for Analyzing Change.
DOI: 10.1037/10378-002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process analysis of group interaction in therapeutic groups.

Abstract: Group psychotherapy works! Armed with a growing number of metaanalytic studies, beginning with the classic work of Smith, Glass, and Miller (1980) and complemented by a recent influential national survey of consumers (Seligman, 1995), reviewers of the group psychotherapy research literature can now state with a reasonable degree of confidence that group psychotherapy yields beneficial effects when compared with no treatment and equivalent results when compared with more costly individual psychotherapy. The pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Keywords: group leadership, group psychotherapy, group assessment, group cohesion One of the most neglected areas in group research literature has been that of leader effects on groups (Dykeman & Appleton, 2002;Greene, 2000). Accordingly, a recent review of the current status of group psychotherapy research by Burlingame, MacKenzie, and Strauss (2004) issued a call for the development of leader measures as a next step in the group treatment literature.…”
Section: Brigham Young Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keywords: group leadership, group psychotherapy, group assessment, group cohesion One of the most neglected areas in group research literature has been that of leader effects on groups (Dykeman & Appleton, 2002;Greene, 2000). Accordingly, a recent review of the current status of group psychotherapy research by Burlingame, MacKenzie, and Strauss (2004) issued a call for the development of leader measures as a next step in the group treatment literature.…”
Section: Brigham Young Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green [54] highlighted the irony that the most empirically studied group, therapy approach (CBT) ignores the group as a "group" and as a potential therapeutic agent in itself. The results of this study support the hypothesis that the group as a "group" is very important for the learning process in CBT tutorial.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overwhelming consensus in the literature is that group counseling is as clinically valid as individual counseling for the prevention and remediation of mental health concerns (Fuhriman & Burlingame, 1994;Kivlighan, Coleman, & Anderson, 2000). Although this assertion is based largely on meta-analyses of processes and outcomes of group-counseling interventions with adults (Fuhriman & Burlingame, 1994;Greene, 2000;Tillitski, 1990), there is a growing body of literature that indicates the same equivalency in treatment modes for children and adolescents (Shechtman & Ben-David, 1999). In addition, group counseling is a highly popular treatment modality for children in schools.…”
Section: Group-counseling Research With Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%