2016
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201600359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process-based Modelling of Sediment Distribution in Fluvial Crevasse Splays Validated by Outcrop Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having two water level boundary conditions as the driving force, as opposed to an upstream discharge boundary condition, is critical as it results in a floodplain-dependent discharge and sediment supply that enables levee breaches to close or to expand into an avulsion. Other morphodynamic models of crevasse splays (e.g., Hajek & Edmonds, 2014;Millard et al, 2017;Sandén et al, 2016) simulate autogenic breach discharge by including the trunk channel itself into the model domain. However, simulating the trunk channel is computationally expensive and numerically challenging, so here we simplify the channel boundary in order to focus deliberately on the role of floodplain conditions.…”
Section: à4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having two water level boundary conditions as the driving force, as opposed to an upstream discharge boundary condition, is critical as it results in a floodplain-dependent discharge and sediment supply that enables levee breaches to close or to expand into an avulsion. Other morphodynamic models of crevasse splays (e.g., Hajek & Edmonds, 2014;Millard et al, 2017;Sandén et al, 2016) simulate autogenic breach discharge by including the trunk channel itself into the model domain. However, simulating the trunk channel is computationally expensive and numerically challenging, so here we simplify the channel boundary in order to focus deliberately on the role of floodplain conditions.…”
Section: à4mentioning
confidence: 99%