2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11128-019-2320-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process estimation in qubit systems: a quantum decision theory approach

Abstract: We address quantum decision theory as a convenient framework to analyze process discrimination and estimation in qubit systems. In particular we discuss the following problems: i) how to discriminate whether or not a given unitary perturbation has been applied to a qubit system; ii) how to determine the amplitude of the minimum detectable perturbation. In order to solve the first problem, we exploit the so-called Bayes strategy, and look for the optimal measurement to discriminate, with minimum error probabili… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Discrimination of two quantum processes with maximum average success probability has been widely studied [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. Optimal unambiguous discrimination [42][43][44][45], optimal inconclusive discrimination [38], and the Neyman-Pearson strategy [46,47] have also been investigated. It is well known that the problem of finding minimumerror discrimination between two channels can be formulated as an SDP problem [48][49][50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discrimination of two quantum processes with maximum average success probability has been widely studied [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. Optimal unambiguous discrimination [42][43][44][45], optimal inconclusive discrimination [38], and the Neyman-Pearson strategy [46,47] have also been investigated. It is well known that the problem of finding minimumerror discrimination between two channels can be formulated as an SDP problem [48][49][50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%