2008 15th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2008.4711856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process flow for classification and clustering of fruit fly gene expression patterns

Abstract: The rapidly growing collection of fruit fly embryo images makes automated Image Segmentation and classification an indispensable requirement for a large-scale analysis of in situ hybridization (ISH) -gene expression patterns (GEP). We present here such an automated process flow for Segmenting, Classification, and Clustering large-scale sets of Drosophila melanogaster GEP that is capable of dealing with most of the complications implicated in the images.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This network-based approach circumvents problems associated with traditional classification methods that rely solely on standardized images 19 and use of individual pixel classification methodologies 36, 37 . While some systems exist for classifying spatial patterns in zebrafish 17 , C. elegans 15 and Drosophila embryos 19,3840 , previous approaches require specifically orientated and annotated images, are specific to the organism of interest, and/or often do not have single cell resolution. In particular, machine learning algorithms developed for positional dependence of patterning in Drosophila have not relied on individual cell segmentation for evolution of network connectivity over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This network-based approach circumvents problems associated with traditional classification methods that rely solely on standardized images 19 and use of individual pixel classification methodologies 36, 37 . While some systems exist for classifying spatial patterns in zebrafish 17 , C. elegans 15 and Drosophila embryos 19,3840 , previous approaches require specifically orientated and annotated images, are specific to the organism of interest, and/or often do not have single cell resolution. In particular, machine learning algorithms developed for positional dependence of patterning in Drosophila have not relied on individual cell segmentation for evolution of network connectivity over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously explained in our recent publication [14] the elaborated processing pipeline include six basic steps. The preprocessing (i) consists of a shading correction and a contrast optimization method resulting in a "'clean image"'.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GEP extraction (v) step has been modified from the GMM method described in [14] to a HSV color space transformation. The pattern is extracted by taking the color intensity information from the V-channel and setting all values smaller than 20 percent to zero (denoising).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peng et al [15] developed an automatic image annotation framework using three different feature representations (based on Gaussian Mixture Models, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and wavelet functions) and several classifiers, including Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA). Heffel et al [16] proposed an embryo outline extraction and transformation and conversion to Fourier coefficients-based feature representation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%