Process indicators for safe motherhood programmes: their application and implications as derived from hospital data in Nepal

Abstract

SummaryMeasuring maternal mortality ratios is fraught with problems and underestimates. Therefore process indicators have been proposed for monitoring the availability and use of obstetrics services. We report the results of process indicators for measuring the availability, use and quality of obstetric care in five districts in Nepal between 1997 and 1998. The number of comprehensive essential obstetric care (EOC) facilities was adequate for four of the five districts, but none had a minimum acceptable level of basic EOC facilities as set by UNICEF et al. The proportion of expected births in hospital was 21.5% in Rupandehi and Ͻ 5% in Baglung, Kailali, Okhaldunga and Surkhet. The minimum acceptable level is 15%. The 'met need' for obstetric care which pertains to the proportion of all women with direct obstetric complications that are treated in hospital was 14.9% in Rupandehi and Ͻ 5% in the other four districts, against the required minimum of 15%. The caesarean section rate calculated of all expected births in the population varied between 0.2% and 1.4%. The case fatality rate was 4.0% in Rupandehi Zonal Hospital. Analysis of these indicators clearly identified tremendous underuse of maternity services which has stimulated national policy discussions in Nepal with ensuing safe motherhood interventions and monitoring strategies.keywords process indicators, met obstetric need, Nepal, maternal mortality, maternal morbidity correspondence Dr Barbara E. Kwast,

Emergency obstetric care: How do we stand in Malawi?

“…The findings are presented by UN process indicator. These indicators have been used to assess services available at selected hospitals in other countries [4]. In fact, as early as 1998, the Malawi Safe Motherhood Project introduced these indicators throughout the Southern Region of the country as part of a routine monitoring system, and collected and analyzed data for 3 consecutive years following its introduction [5,6].…”

The global met need for emergency obstetric care: a systematic review

“…The non‐inclusion of abortion complications and ectopic pregnancies in the numerator for met need may have been influenced by legal and cultural factors surrounding abortion, rather than the organisation and delivery of care. These highly important factors may skew the measurement of met need . Met need may be underestimated when facilities not designated as EmOC facilities or private facilities are excluded .…”

Are Process Indicators Adequate to Assess Essential Obstetric Care at District Level?: A Case Study from Rufiji District, Tanzania

“…Complications of abortion included infection or persistent haemorrhage, requiring evacuation of retained products. In settings where cases of abortions are common, this could contribute to an inflation of the met need indicator since only few abortions really need any intervention 23 . In countries like Tanzania, where induced abortion is illegal these cases may be labelled as complications of spontaneous abortion to cover for the legal aspect.…”