2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.02.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process integration of chemical looping combustion with oxygen uncoupling in a coal-fired power plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both in iG-CLC and CLOU, the net electrical efficiency, including CO compression and oxygen production for the oxygen polishing step when required, has been calculated to be 35-36 % for super critical steam cycle [191,308] and 41-42 % considering ultrasuper critical plants [309][310][311][312][313]. Recently, the net electric efficiency of a power plant based on CLOU has been estimated in the 46-48 % interval for coal, lignite and sawdust, while the CO 2 capture rate was above 99 % [314].…”
Section: Net Energy Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both in iG-CLC and CLOU, the net electrical efficiency, including CO compression and oxygen production for the oxygen polishing step when required, has been calculated to be 35-36 % for super critical steam cycle [191,308] and 41-42 % considering ultrasuper critical plants [309][310][311][312][313]. Recently, the net electric efficiency of a power plant based on CLOU has been estimated in the 46-48 % interval for coal, lignite and sawdust, while the CO 2 capture rate was above 99 % [314].…”
Section: Net Energy Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the amount of solids to be handled in the CaLC process would be, on average, 2.4 times lower compared to the system based on chemical looping combustion, implying lower power requirements for solid handling. This is because the average mass flow rate ratios of solids circulated between the reactors and the steam entering the HP turbine in the CaLC process proposed in this study and the CFPP based on chemical looping combustion analysed by Spinelli et al [54] are 3.7 and 8.7, respectively † . Furthermore, the CaLC process with CCU would impose a small net efficiency penalty of 2.4% points, which is similar to the net efficiency penalty reported for the CaL with an indirectly-heated calciner in the retrofit scenario without CCU [26].…”
Section: Parametric Studymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…As a result (Table 4), the net thermal efficiency of the CaLC process (without CCU) increased from 38.1% HHV to 38.7% HHV , resulting in 0.7% HHV point net efficiency gain compared to the conventional CFPP, while the specific CO 2 emission target of 100 g/kW el h is met. Such performance is superior to the CFPP based on chemical looping combustion, which was reported to yield no net efficiency penalty [54]. In addition, the amount of solids to be handled in the CaLC process would be, on average, 2.4 times lower compared to the system based on chemical looping combustion, implying lower power requirements for solid handling.…”
Section: Parametric Studymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They also demonstrated that it was possible to achieve CO 2 yields of above 99 % with ilmenite at 950 °C [26]. Moldenhauer et al [24] also suggested that although fuel conversion at the lowest temperatures (650-700 °C) was still relatively high, the CLOU properties, where the oxygen carriers can release their oxygen can be neglected at such temperatures [28]. CLOU requires temperatures of >800 °C for CuO to reduce to Cu 2 O, >700 °C for Mn 2 O 3 to reduce to Mn 3 O 4 and >750 °C for Co 3 O 4 to reduce CoO [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%