2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89784-2_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process Mediation of OWL-S Web Services

Abstract: Abstract. The ability to deal with incompatibilities of service requesters and providers is a critical factor for achieving smooth interoperability in dynamic environments. Achieving interoperability of existing web services is a costly process including a lot of development and integration effort which is far from being automated. Semantic Web Services frameworks strive to facilitate flexible dynamic web services discovery, invocation and composition and to support automation of these processes. In this paper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the semantic based category, only Kubczak [21] approach can provide high correctness as compared to Vitvar [36], Sycara [32] and Brambilla [5] that only ranked as medium and low.…”
Section: Table 3 Comparative Evaluation For Correctnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the semantic based category, only Kubczak [21] approach can provide high correctness as compared to Vitvar [36], Sycara [32] and Brambilla [5] that only ranked as medium and low.…”
Section: Table 3 Comparative Evaluation For Correctnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore more research tasks required in order to generate process mediator at runtime with high expressiveness, automation, correctness and completeness. Moreover, the existing semantic based approaches such as Vitvar [36](WSMO), Sycara [32] (OWL-S) Brambilla [5] (WSMO) and Kubczak [21] were only focuses on rule-based and planner-based methods to resolve behavioral interoperability in Web Services but not pattern-based methods.…”
Section: Table 5 Summary Of Comparative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%