Abstract:A considerable part of educational systems tends to be online and computer oriented. However, online examination may create some difficulties during the evaluation of student performance. Process mining which arises as a new concept presents various powerful techniques for processing and analyzing different types of data by making use of some advanced information technologies. This paper proposes a novel approach based on process mining for evaluating the performance of students that should follow certain task… Show more
E-learning in higher education is exponentially increased during the past decade due to its inevitable benefits in critical situations like natural disasters, wars, and pandemic like COVID 2019. The reliable, fair, and seamless execution of online exams in E-learning is highly significant. Particularly, online exams are conducted on E-learning platforms without the physical presence of students and instructors at the same place. This poses several issues like integrity and security during online exams. To address such issues, researchers frequently proposed different techniques and tools. However, a study summarizing and analyzing latest developments, particularly in the area of online examination, is hard to find in the literature. In this article, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of online examination is performed to select and analyze 53 studies published during the last five years (i.e. Jan 2016 to July 2020). Subsequently, five leading online exams features targeted in the selected studies are identified. Moreover, underlying development approaches for the implementation of online exams solutions are explored. Furthermore, 16 important techniques / algorithms and 11 datasets are presented. In addition to this, 21 online exams tools proposed in the selected studies are identified. Additionally, 25 leading existing tools used in the selected studies are also presented. Finally, the par-
E-learning in higher education is exponentially increased during the past decade due to its inevitable benefits in critical situations like natural disasters, wars, and pandemic like COVID 2019. The reliable, fair, and seamless execution of online exams in E-learning is highly significant. Particularly, online exams are conducted on E-learning platforms without the physical presence of students and instructors at the same place. This poses several issues like integrity and security during online exams. To address such issues, researchers frequently proposed different techniques and tools. However, a study summarizing and analyzing latest developments, particularly in the area of online examination, is hard to find in the literature. In this article, a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) of online examination is performed to select and analyze 53 studies published during the last five years (i.e. Jan 2016 to July 2020). Subsequently, five leading online exams features targeted in the selected studies are identified. Moreover, underlying development approaches for the implementation of online exams solutions are explored. Furthermore, 16 important techniques / algorithms and 11 datasets are presented. In addition to this, 21 online exams tools proposed in the selected studies are identified. Additionally, 25 leading existing tools used in the selected studies are also presented. Finally, the par-
“…Trends of increasing enrollment, reduction in costs of PCs, and the success of computerized testing in other disciplines have been motivating its recent research in Engineering . For instance, the University of Utah and Brigham Young University (BYU) Testing Centers (TCs) recently provide computerized testing facilities for engineering and science programs using digitized assessments.…”
Section: Selected Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, diligent efforts by the instructor and Graduate Teaching Assistants (GTAs) to realize accurate paper‐based assessments contribute negligible transferable progress towards those same tasks in subsequent semesters. The feasibility of digitized exams within engineering disciplines has received increasing attention in recent years . Challenges for assessment digitization within engineering curricula include partial credit, solution composability/traceability via handwritten work, and assessment of problem solving aspects within the constraints of contemporary Learning Management Systems (LMSs) .…”
Engineering's design‐oriented and problem‐solving emphases pose considerable challenges to the use of multiple choice assessments, and thus the use of digitized forms of assessment within Engineering curricula warrants a substantive evaluation of their validity. To address this research need, novel computer‐based assessment infrastructures and delivery protocols were launched via a crossover study as defined below. The objective of the study was to investigate the impact of proctored digitized examination that was delivered using a secure or “lockdown” internet browser interface. Measures tracked in the study included test score validity, learning achievement, and student perceptions within a large‐size undergraduate Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering course. Using a crossover‐based study design, the class was divided into two cohorts. Half of each cohort's formative assessments were delivered in a computer‐based testing center via and the other half of the assessments were delivered on paper. Within each cohort, the intervention of computerized delivery was interchanged with paper‐based delivery during successive topic modules on a mutually‐exclusive basis. An identical paper‐based final exam was delivered to all students. The data collected was analyzed and de‐correlated to investigate the topic‐specific learning outcomes of digitized assessment. Test score validity and learning outcomes were studied using independent sample t‐test statistical analysis. Results indicate that well‐formed digitized exams can determine scores differing as little as 0.6% from paper‐based assessment. Moreover, when the labor hours of the grader which were freed up were reallocated to tutoring and remediation of formative assessments, the as much as 16.9% higher learning outcomes were obtained during summative assessment as compared to paper‐based delivery.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.