2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-5764-4_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process Model for Accessible Website User Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average reaction time of the participants by different color combinations is shown in Figure 8 c. The best results were obtained with high-contrast combinations (yellow–black, color01; black–white, color05; black–yellow, color09; blue–yellow, color10; green–black, color11; white–black, color13). Most of the efficient color combinations (color01, color09, color10, and color11) are combinations from the methodology created in a previous study on the use of efficient color and contrast combinations on the web [ 39 ]. Apart from that, good results were obtained when using interfaces with high-contrast monochrome black and white (color5) and white and black (color13) combinations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average reaction time of the participants by different color combinations is shown in Figure 8 c. The best results were obtained with high-contrast combinations (yellow–black, color01; black–white, color05; black–yellow, color09; blue–yellow, color10; green–black, color11; white–black, color13). Most of the efficient color combinations (color01, color09, color10, and color11) are combinations from the methodology created in a previous study on the use of efficient color and contrast combinations on the web [ 39 ]. Apart from that, good results were obtained when using interfaces with high-contrast monochrome black and white (color5) and white and black (color13) combinations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%