2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Process sampling module coupled with purge and trap–GC–FID for in situ auto-monitoring of volatile organic compounds in wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result showed that CLSA was a good tool for analysis of GSM and 2-MIB at a low level [17]. Some other methods such as purge and trap (P&T) coupled to gas chromatography with mass spectrometry [18, 19] or to GC-FID [20], liquid-liquid microextraction (LLME) [21], stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) [2224], and solid-phase extraction (SPE) [25] can also be taken to detect the earthy and musty odors in water at nanogram-per-liter level. Although these techniques greatly improve the limits and sensitivity of detection, some shortcomings restrict extensive usage of these methods, including unsuitable for the analysis of low-boiling-point odors and time-consuming (SPE, SBSE) [26, 27], lacking stability of droplet during extraction (LLME), and the sodium chloride, could be spurge onto the upside of purge tube and subsequently the sodium chloride was dragged in tubes and valves, causing abrasion by using P&T [10, 18, 28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result showed that CLSA was a good tool for analysis of GSM and 2-MIB at a low level [17]. Some other methods such as purge and trap (P&T) coupled to gas chromatography with mass spectrometry [18, 19] or to GC-FID [20], liquid-liquid microextraction (LLME) [21], stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) [2224], and solid-phase extraction (SPE) [25] can also be taken to detect the earthy and musty odors in water at nanogram-per-liter level. Although these techniques greatly improve the limits and sensitivity of detection, some shortcomings restrict extensive usage of these methods, including unsuitable for the analysis of low-boiling-point odors and time-consuming (SPE, SBSE) [26, 27], lacking stability of droplet during extraction (LLME), and the sodium chloride, could be spurge onto the upside of purge tube and subsequently the sodium chloride was dragged in tubes and valves, causing abrasion by using P&T [10, 18, 28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is labor-intensive and time-consuming. Some other methods, such as purge and trap coupled to gas chromatography with mass spectrometry [12, 13] or to GC-FID [14], liquid-liquid microextraction (LLME) [15], stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) [1618], and solid-phase extraction (SPE) [19], can also be taken to detect the VOCs in water at  ng L −1 levels. Although these techniques greatly improve the limits and sensitivity of detection, some shortcomings such as being unsuitable for the analysis of low-boiling-point odors and time-consuming (SPE, SBSE) [20, 21] and lacking the stability of droplet during extraction (LPME) restrict the extensive use of these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purge and trap (PT) technique has been developed for the separation and pre-concentration of a variety of organic volatiles from different matrices. [5,6] It was reported that PT technique was used for determination the migration of VCM in poly (vinyl chloride) [7] and other PVC matrices with trace concentrations. The determination of VCM in wastewater using PT technique was rarely reported especially for fast and direct determination of high concentration VCM in wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%