2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2015.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processes limiting mussel bed restoration in the Wadden-Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the mussels within two of the three additional mussel beds were dispersed over a wide area (>40 m, seaward) during a storm event on 5–8 June 2014. Physical forcing by wave action can lead to the erosion of mussels from populations, which can result in the loss of transplanted mussels within months (de Paoli et al ). Although the effects of storm events are hard to predict, establishing mussel beds at depths where they are less likely to suffer physical removal caused by wave action may be prudent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the mussels within two of the three additional mussel beds were dispersed over a wide area (>40 m, seaward) during a storm event on 5–8 June 2014. Physical forcing by wave action can lead to the erosion of mussels from populations, which can result in the loss of transplanted mussels within months (de Paoli et al ). Although the effects of storm events are hard to predict, establishing mussel beds at depths where they are less likely to suffer physical removal caused by wave action may be prudent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven mussel beds were established by transferring large numbers of adult mussels from aquaculture onto soft-sediments at a restoration site and four of these beds were subsequently assessed regularly over 2 years for changes in population size and the size structure of mussels. These four mussel beds (>24 m 2 ), which are larger than most plots of transplanted mussels in previous mussel restoration studies (<10 m 2 ) (Fariñas-Franco et al 2013;van der Heide et al 2014;de Paoli et al 2015), provided the opportunity to observe potential effects of density-dependent factors on the persistence of the beds. The results of this study will help contribute to the development of best-practice methods for future mussel restoration initiatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using manipulative experiments, we tested whether spatial selforganization affects the persistence of mussels within intertidal mussel beds under the natural influence of wave action and predation (29). In both June and October of 2012, we created artificial mussel beds with small-scale and large-scale spatial patterns, similar to the patterns found in natural conditions, and determined their effect on the persistence of mussels in the bed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cockles and lugworms live in the sediment and have local effects on sediment stability (de Paoli et al. ). Lugworms are upward conveyors: strong bioturbators that process the sediment in their gut and thereby de‐stabilize the sediment and decrease microphytobenthos biomass.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intertidal mussels form beds that have a large influence on the sediment environment, increasing sediment organic content for 100s of meters across the tidal flat by (1) decreasing water flow rates, which decrease sediment erosion and thereby exercise long-range facilitation of associated fauna and microphytobenthos biomass (Donadi et al 2013a; and (2) depositing feces and pseudofeces (Graf andRosenberg 1997, Bergfeld 1999). Cockles and lugworms live in the sediment and have local effects on sediment stability (de Paoli et al 2015). Lugworms are upward conveyors: strong bioturbators that process the sediment in their gut and thereby de-stabilize the sediment and decrease microphytobenthos biomass.…”
Section: Study Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%