1999
DOI: 10.1080/089856299283290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Processes of innovation among manufacturing SMEs: the experience of Bedfordshire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
50
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
50
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, product innovation capability is deemed to be stronger in sectors of higher technological intensity such as electronics and biotechnology (Subrahmanya, 2005). Also, prior research has confirmed the theoretical and empirical importance of industry as a contingency factor in the relationship between innovation capability and organizational performance (Kalantaridis and Pheby, 1999;Tidd, Bessant and Pavitt, 2005;RochinaBarrachina, Mañez and Sachis-Llopis, 2010). It is thus important to be able to distinguish between firm and industry effects when testing the research hypotheses (Mauri and Michaels, 1998), which is why the research model includes the technological intensity of the industrial sector as a control variable.…”
Section: Hypothesis 3 -The Greater the Firm's It Integration The Grementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, product innovation capability is deemed to be stronger in sectors of higher technological intensity such as electronics and biotechnology (Subrahmanya, 2005). Also, prior research has confirmed the theoretical and empirical importance of industry as a contingency factor in the relationship between innovation capability and organizational performance (Kalantaridis and Pheby, 1999;Tidd, Bessant and Pavitt, 2005;RochinaBarrachina, Mañez and Sachis-Llopis, 2010). It is thus important to be able to distinguish between firm and industry effects when testing the research hypotheses (Mauri and Michaels, 1998), which is why the research model includes the technological intensity of the industrial sector as a control variable.…”
Section: Hypothesis 3 -The Greater the Firm's It Integration The Grementioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is thus important to be able to distinguish between firm and industry effects when testing the research hypotheses (Mauri and Michaels, 1998), which is why the research model includes the technological intensity of the industrial sector as a control variable. The size and the age of the firm were also added as control variables, given their potential effect on the growth and productivity of SMEs (Delmar, Davidsson and Gartner, 2003;Freel, 2000;Kalantaridis and Pheby, 1999).…”
Section: Hypothesis 3 -The Greater the Firm's It Integration The Grementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brouwer et al (1993) confirmed the significantly positive impact of innovation (of products) on employment growth, also Moore (1995); Westhead and Cowling (1995); Tether and Massini (1998). In contrast, other studies suggest that innovative activity is not positively related to creation of jobs (Kalantaridis and Pheby, 1999). Del Monte and Papagni (2003) report a positive relationship between innovation and revenue growth in their analysis of Italian manufacturing firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…To measure the importance of innovation activities, they were also asked to evaluate the service innovation, processes innovation and management systems innovation, see Table 1, by means of a five-point Likert scale (from 1 = Not Important to 5 = Very Important) as their limits (Madrid-Guijarro et al, 2009;Frishammar & Hörte, 2005;Kalantaridis & Pheby, 1999;Zahra & Covin, 1993). Regarding the barriers to innovation, sixteen 'subbarriers' were selected, based on the Exploratory Factor Analysis as carried out and defined Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%