Processes supporting effective skill-mix implementation in general practice: A qualitative study

Abstract

Objectives Health policy and funding initiatives have addressed increasing workloads in general practice through the deployment of clinicians from different disciplinary backgrounds. This study examines how general practices in England operate with increasingly diverse groups of practitioners. Methods Five general practices were selected for maximum variation of the duration and diversity of skill-mix in their workforce. Individual interviews were recorded with management and administrative staff and different types of practitioner. Patient surveys and focus groups gathered patients’ perspectives of consulting with different practitioners. Researchers collaborated during coding and thematic analysis of transcripts of audio recordings. Results The introduction of a wide range of practitioners required significant changes in how practices dealt with patients requesting treatment, and these changes were not necessarily straightforward. The matching of patients with practitioners required effective categorization of health care patients’ reported problem(s) and an understanding of practitioners’ capabilities. We identified individual and organizational responses that could minimize the impact on patients, practitioners and practices of imperfections in the matching process. Conclusions The processes underpinning the redistribution of tasks from GPs to non-GP practitioners are complex. As practitioner employment under the Primary Care Network contracts continues to increase, it is not clear how the necessarily fine-grained adjustments will be made for practitioners working across multiple practices.

Primary care transformation in Scotland: qualitative evaluation of the views of national senior stakeholders and cluster quality leads

“…As far as we are aware, our study is the first to include views on MDT working as part of the new GP contract in Scotland and our findings raise questions, not only about the numbers of staff being recruited, but also how effectively new staff are being integrated and embedded into primary care teams and the culture of general practice. Recent research in England has identified the complexity of matching' patients' needs with practitioners' capabilities when trying to reduce GP workload by redistributing workload to MDTs [18]. A recent King's Fund report on the expansion of MDT staff in Primary Care Networks (PCNs) in England also concluded that "while PCNs have swiftly recruited to these roles, they are not being implemented and integrated into primary care teams effectively" [19, p. 2].…”

Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme commissioning 2020-2023: associations with patient experience and QOF

“…These studies were conducted during a period of relative stability before the COVID-19 pandemic whereas our study may have been affected by restrictions imposed during the pandemic, despite our primary end point being in the post-pandemic recovery period. Additionally, the transfer of tasks from GPs to non-GP practitioners was identified as a key challenge to be faced by the newly formed PCNs (32). Our outcome was three years after PCNs were introduced, which may have given PCNs sufficient time to address this challenge.…”

What we know and don’t know about the health and social care workforce

“…Policy led changes to skill mix often assume that work can be broken down into discrete, stable tasks. However, research suggests that this provides an impoverished vision of what good quality care looks like, especially in contexts such as general practice 11. Historic workforce forecasting has been based on the number of people in training and education, with much less attention paid to retaining existing staff throughout the career lifecycle.…”