“…The crossover temperature results to be roughly the same for all the systems, and it was observed around 750 K [34]; in Figure 3, reproduced from [34], the trend of the activation energy below and above 750 K, as well as the preexponential factor A appearing in Equation ( 1 In spite of the large differences in ionic conductivity existing betw with different RE 3+ [34], the maximum in ( ) occurs within a na interval, namely at x (in Ce1−xRExO2−x/2) ranging between 0.10 and 0.2 the studied systems, such as for RE ≡ Gd [2], Sm [38], Lu [39], as well higher x, ionic conductivity significantly drops, and its absolute valu significant for any application; nevertheless, even heavily RE-doped interest in fundamental research, since they allow to correlate subtle transport properties [31,32,[40][41][42]. The substantial coincidence of the different systems suggests that the appearance in diffraction patterns o to defect clusters at largely different x values for different RE ions, do F phase has a different extent according to the RE identity; on the co gregates are present and stable even at very low RE concentration, bu ent spatial correlation, they can be identified by X-ray diffraction at di In addition to the numerous studies performed on singly-doped a large number of doubly-and multiply-doped systems has been in Gd/Y- [43], Gd/Sm- [44], La/Sm- [35], Sm/Nd- [45], Nd/Gd- [46], La/ [48]. A general lowering of activation energy [33] and an improveme In spite of the large differences in ionic conductivity existing between systems doped with different RE 3+ [34], the maximum in σ (σ max ) occurs within a narrow compositional interval, namely at x (in Ce 1−x RE x O 2−x/2 ) ranging between 0.10 and 0.25 for the majority of the studied systems, such as for RE ≡ Gd [2], Sm [38], Lu [39], as well as (Nd,Tm) [33].…”